From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media
D Linders - Government information quarterly, 2012 - Elsevier
Government information quarterly, 2012•Elsevier
This paper examines the evolution of citizen coproduction in the age of social media, web
2.0 interactivity, and ubiquitous connectivity. The paper first discusses the re-emergence of
citizen coproduction–whereby citizens perform the role of partner rather than customer in the
delivery of public services–as a fashionable policy option in the face of persistent budget
deficits and the advent of new channels for mass collaboration. Finding a plethora of
competing labels, models, and concepts for coproduction in the age of social media, the …
2.0 interactivity, and ubiquitous connectivity. The paper first discusses the re-emergence of
citizen coproduction–whereby citizens perform the role of partner rather than customer in the
delivery of public services–as a fashionable policy option in the face of persistent budget
deficits and the advent of new channels for mass collaboration. Finding a plethora of
competing labels, models, and concepts for coproduction in the age of social media, the …
This paper examines the evolution of citizen coproduction in the age of social media, web 2.0 interactivity, and ubiquitous connectivity. The paper first discusses the re-emergence of citizen coproduction – whereby citizens perform the role of partner rather than customer in the delivery of public services – as a fashionable policy option in the face of persistent budget deficits and the advent of new channels for mass collaboration. Finding a plethora of competing labels, models, and concepts for coproduction in the age of social media, the paper proposes a unified typology to support systematic analysis based on the overarching categories of “Citizen Sourcing,” “Government as a Platform,” and “Do-It-Yourself Government.” To demonstrate its use, the typology is applied to leading U.S. government implementations. The paper concludes with a discussion of the potential implications for public administration, the remaining limitations and rising social concerns, and the possible emergence of a new social contract that empowers the public to play a far more active role in the functioning of their government.
Elsevier