A behavioral study of bargaining in social networks
We report on a series of highly controlled human subject experiments in networked
bargaining. The basic interaction between two players is the decision of how to share a
mutual payment; we extend this to situate the players in a network. Various theories predict,
to different levels of uniqueness, what the shares will be. We analyze our experimental
results from three points of view: social efficiency, nodal differences, and human differences;
and contrast our behavioral results with the theories.
bargaining. The basic interaction between two players is the decision of how to share a
mutual payment; we extend this to situate the players in a network. Various theories predict,
to different levels of uniqueness, what the shares will be. We analyze our experimental
results from three points of view: social efficiency, nodal differences, and human differences;
and contrast our behavioral results with the theories.
A Behavioral Study of Bargaining in Social Networks
We report on a series of highly controlled human subject experiments in networked
bargaining. The basic interaction between two players is the decision of how to share a
mutual payment; we extend this to situate the players in a network. Various theories predict,
to different levels of uniqueness, what the shares will be. We analyze our experimental
results from three points of view: social efficiency, nodal differences, and human differences;
and contrast our behavioral results with the theories.
bargaining. The basic interaction between two players is the decision of how to share a
mutual payment; we extend this to situate the players in a network. Various theories predict,
to different levels of uniqueness, what the shares will be. We analyze our experimental
results from three points of view: social efficiency, nodal differences, and human differences;
and contrast our behavioral results with the theories.
Showing the best results for this search. See all results