login
A039661
Decimal expansion of exp(Pi).
38
2, 3, 1, 4, 0, 6, 9, 2, 6, 3, 2, 7, 7, 9, 2, 6, 9, 0, 0, 5, 7, 2, 9, 0, 8, 6, 3, 6, 7, 9, 4, 8, 5, 4, 7, 3, 8, 0, 2, 6, 6, 1, 0, 6, 2, 4, 2, 6, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 9, 9, 3, 4, 4, 5, 0, 4, 6, 4, 0, 9, 5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 2, 3, 5, 0, 6, 9, 0, 4, 5, 2, 7, 8, 3, 5, 1, 6, 9, 7, 1, 9, 9, 7, 0, 6, 7, 5, 4, 9, 2
OFFSET
2,1
COMMENTS
e^Pi and Pi^e (A059850) differ by hardly 3% in magnitude. The determination of the inequality sign between them does not require their actual evaluation, the result being immediate from the basic facts Pi>e and log(x+1)<x for positive x, whence setting x=(Pi/e)-1 (>0) yields log(Pi)<Pi/e, or Pi^e < e^Pi.
The formulas give e^Pi, not a(n). Note that e^Pi - Pi = 19.999099979...; that's why e^Pi and 20 + Pi have many common decimal digits. - M. F. Hasler, Oct 24 2009
e^Pi is transcendental, as proved by Gelfond. - Charles R Greathouse IV, May 07 2013
Nesterenko proves that this constant is algebraically independent of Pi and Gamma(1/4) over Q. - Charles R Greathouse IV, Nov 11 2013
Sum of the volumes of all even-dimensional unit spheres. - Paolo Xausa, Nov 14 2021
REFERENCES
L. Berggren, J. Borwein, and P. Borwein, "Pi: a source Book", second edition, Springer, p. 422.
David Wells, The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers. Penguin Books, NY, 1986, Revised edition 1987. See p. 101.
LINKS
Bikash Chakraborty, A Visual Proof that Pi^e < e^Pi, arXiv:1806.03163 [math.HO], 2018.
D. Hilbert, Mathematical Problems, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (2000), 407-436. Reprinted from Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (Jul 1902), 437-479. See Problem 7.
Fouad Nakhli, Proof without Words Pi^e < e^Pi, Mathematics Magazine, 60(3) (1987), pp. 165.
Yu V. Nesterenko, Modular functions and transcendence questions, Sbornik: Mathematics 187:9 (1996), pp. 1319-1348. (English translation)
Simon Plouffe, exp(Pi) to 5000 digits.
Arjun K. Rathie, Gradimir V. Milovanović, and Richard B. Paris, Hypergeometric representations of Gelfond's constant and its generalisations, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (2021).
H. S. Uhler, On the numerical value of i^i, Amer. Math. Monthly, 28 (1921), 114-116.
Andrés Vallejo and Italo Bove, Which is greater: e^Pi or Pi^e? An unorthodox solution to a classic puzzle, arXiv:2309.10826 [physics.class-ph], 2023.
Eric Weisstein, Gelfond's Constant.
Wikipedia, Gelfond's constant.
OEIS Wiki, Gelfond's constant.
FORMULA
e^Pi = 32*Product_{j>=0} (u(j+1)/u(j))^2^(-j+1)) where u(0)=1 and v(0)=1/sqrt(2); u(n+1) = u(n)/2 + v(n)/2, v(n+1) = sqrt(u(n)v(n)) (deduced from Salamin algorithm for Pi). - Benoit Cloitre, Aug 14 2003
e^Pi = Sum_{k>=0} a(k)/k!/2^k where a(0)=1, a(1)=6 and a(n) = (40 - 4*n + n^2)*a(n-2) for n>=2 (from expansion of exp(6*asin(x)) at x=1/2). - Jaume Oliver Lafont, Oct 21 2009
exp(Pi) ~= log(Pi) + 7*Pi. - Alexander R. Povolotsky, Oct 24 2009
Equals Sum_{k>=0} Pi^k/k!. - Paolo Xausa, Nov 14 2021
EXAMPLE
23.1406926327792690...
MATHEMATICA
RealDigits[N[E^Pi, 200]] (* Vladimir Joseph Stephan Orlovsky, May 27 2010 *)
PROG
(PARI) default(realprecision, 20080); x=exp(1)^Pi/10; for (n=2, 20000, d=floor(x); x=(x-d)*10; write("b039661.txt", n, " ", d)); \\ Harry J. Smith, Apr 18 2009
(PARI) A039661(n)=default(realprecision, n); exp(Pi)\10^(3-n)%10 \\ M. F. Hasler, Oct 24 2009
CROSSREFS
Cf. A059850 (Pi^e).
Cf. A058287 = contfrac(e^Pi), A058288 = contfrac(Pi^e).
Sequence in context: A306646 A152832 A211343 * A293668 A214684 A268727
KEYWORD
nonn,cons
STATUS
approved