Introduction by Croakey: Our news and communications systems are a big, fat steaming mess – locally, nationally and globally.
If this sounds like an over-statement, think of the many communities in Australia and elsewhere that are devoid of truly local news organisations. Think of the undermining of public broadcasters, and of the power of Elon Musk, Meta et al and of untransparent, unaccountable algorithms in shaping access to news and information, as well as in undermining many other determinants of health.
Think also of the unrelenting, dangerous tide of misinformation, disinformation and online scammers.
It is well past time for governments in Australia and elsewhere to step up in ensuring people and communities have equitable access to reliable, safe and relevant news and information (see, for example, our #DigitalNationBuilding archive).
In the United States, New York has become the first state to commit significant resources toward keeping local journalism alive, Columbia Journalism Review reported this week. The Local Journalism Sustainability Act was included in New York’s recently passed state budget, setting aside $US 90 million to subsidise local news for the next three years.
Supporting public interest journalism is, of course, only part of the solution. In our submission to the National Health and Climate Strategy consultation last year, Croakey called for a whole-of-government approach to addressing our toxic news and communications system.
“The news and information ecosystem currently does not support communities to be informed about and engaged with climate mitigation and adaptation,” our submission read.
As we’ve long argued, media and communications policy is too important to be left to Media and Communications Ministers and agencies, and sectoral interests.
The health sector and wider civil society have a vital stake in these policy concerns, and are encouraged to engage with related Federal Budget discussions next week, and beyond.
And as the Albanese Government considers whether to designate Meta under the News Media Bargaining Code (see this recent Croakey Health Media statement on why this would be problematic), it’s worth considering the perspectives below from Canada, arguing that similar legislation there has been disastrous.
The article was first published by The Conversation in Canada under the headline, Meta’s Canadian news ban could put people at risk during public emergencies.