Info
Jessika van Veen is co-head of the Alvarez & Marsal Benelux Practice and a senior partner in the Private Equity Services unit mainly working for PE’s, investors and portfolio management across all sectors. She joined A&M with a long tenure in industry, in her latest roles as CEO. Jessika brings almost 30 years of experience combining pre-deal experience with leading large, complex transformations and turnaround cases as a senior leader and advisor. She takes on C-level roles as CEO, CFO, COO and CRO when required and acts as an advisor, coach and confident for PE firms, boards and management at the strategic and tactical level.
Ervaring
Opleiding
Talen
-
French
Basisvaardigheid
-
English
Volledige professionele vaardigheid
-
German
Professionele werkvaardigheid
-
Dutch
Moedertaal of tweetalig
Overige vergelijkbare profielen
Meer bijdragen onderzoeken
-
SCC Online
'HC ignored evidence indicating complicity'; SC sets aside order quashing FIR against Police Official accused of taking bribes Reported by Deeksha Dabas Read More Here- https://lnkd.in/eQRap--C #SupremeCourt #Policeofficialtakingbribe #PreventionofCorruptionAct #scconline #SCC #legalnews #scconlineblog #legalknowledge #scctimes #legalblog #legalupdates #lawstudent #legalresearch #legalstudies #surestwaytolegalresearch #bringingyouthebestlegalnews
-
No18 Chambers
Robing pilot begins at Central Family Court: From Monday 15 April 2024, in a pilot intended to explore the impact of increased formality in family courts, judges sitting at Central Family Court will wear robes during proceedings. This follows concern about incidents of violent and threatening behaviour experienced by judges and court users. Unlike in criminal proceedings, robes are not normally worn by judges in family courts. Judges in the pilot will not wear wigs, and practitioners will not be expected to wear robes. The pilot has been approved by Sir Andrew McFarlane, the President of the Family Division, and it will run for an initial three-month period. A survey will be conducted before, during and after the pilot to assess if robing makes a difference to family court proceedings. This evaluation will consider the number of behavioural incidents experienced and judges’ perceptions of their own authority and safety.
