Sorry, this video isn't available any more.
This Morning star Josie Gibson has shared her fury over the BBC paying Huw Edwards a salary between £475,000 and £479,000 before he resigned from the corporation in April.
The veteran broadcaster, 62, pleaded guilty in court on Wednesday to making indecent images of children, after he committed three offences between December 2020 and April 2021.
He admitted accessing indecent photographs of children as young as seven after a man he met online sent him hundreds of sexual images on WhatsApp.
It has since emerged that the BBC knew of his arrest in November, on ‘suspicion of serious offences’, but continued employing him until April, when he resigned on medical advice.
Before his departure, he was paid between £475,000 and £479,999 for the year 2023/24, according to the BBC’s latest annual report.
This last salary marked a £40,000 pay rise from 2022/23, when he was paid between £435,000 and 439,999.
Speaking on Thursday’s This Morning, Josie said: ‘It makes my blood boil, my absolute blood boil.’
Talking about the charges against Edwards, she added: ‘As a mother, it makes my stomach turn.’
As the discussion turned towards his salary, Tim Campbell explained: ‘It’s really difficult, as an employer you’re sometimes faced with disciplinary processes which mean you may have to suspend an individual while an investigation is going on, and the headline figures around paying someone can be very inflammatory because nobody wants to see someone who has now admitted guilt receiving tax-payer’s money.’
Josie then repeated the charges, which involve indecent images of one child under nine, before saying: ‘I’m fuming.’
‘I agree with Josie, it’s really disturbing,’ co-host Craig Doyle added, urging for a new clause that would allow a portion of the salary to be returned.
The court heard that Edwards had been involved in online chat with an adult man on WhatsApp between December 2020 and August 2021, who sent him 377 sexual images, of which 41 were indecent images of children.
The bulk of these, 36, were sent during a two-month period.
On February 2, 2021 the male asked whether what he was sending was too young, in response to which Edwards told him not to send any underage images, the court heard.
The indecent images that were sent included seven category A, the worst, 12 category B, and 22 category C.
Of the category A images, the estimated age of most of the children was between 13 and 15, but one was aged between seven and nine, the court was told.
The final indecent image was sent in August 2021, a category A film featuring a young boy.
The man told Edwards that the boy was quite young looking, and that he had more images which were illegal.
Edwards told him not to send any illegal images, the court was told.
No more were sent, and the pair continued to exchange legal pornographic images until April 2022.
The BBC has said that if Edwards had been charged while he was still an employee it would have sacked him, but at the point of charge in June he no longer worked for the corporation.
After his guilty plea on Wednesday, a BBC spokesperson said: ‘In November 2023, whilst Mr Edwards was suspended, the BBC as his employer at the time was made aware in confidence that he had been arrested on suspicion of serious offences and released on bail whilst the police continued their investigation.
‘At the time, no charges had been brought against Mr Edwards and the BBC had also been made aware of significant risk to his health.’
The corporation added: ‘The BBC is shocked to hear the details which have emerged in court today. There can be no place for such abhorrent behaviour and our thoughts are with all those affected.
‘Today we have learnt of the conclusion of the police process in the details as presented to the court.
‘If at any point during the period Mr Edwards was employed by the BBC he had been charged, the BBC had determined it would act immediately to dismiss him. In the end, at the point of charge he was no longer an employee of the BBC.
‘During this period, in the usual way, the BBC has kept its corporate management of these issues separate from its independent editorial functions.’
At the time the annual report was published, BBC director-general Tim Davie defended Edwards’ £40,000 pay rise, saying: ‘We are always trying to be very judicious with the spending of public money and no-one wants to waste a pound.
‘But what you’re trying to do, and from the onset of that affair, was trying to act proportionally, fairly and navigate this appropriately.
‘I think that’s what we did… but I think we wouldn’t have wasted money if we weren’t doing the right thing.’
Davie is now set to face questions from Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy about what the corporation knew about Edwards’ case, and questions will likely be raised about why he continued to receive his large salary – as the highest paid newsreader at the corporation – for five months after his arrest on charges of making indecent photographs of children.
Meanwhile, Jeremy Vine has said the BBC should clarify if Edwards was asked if he was guilty at the time the corporation was informed of his arrest for making indecent images of children.
Vine, who hosts a show on BBC Radio 2, said bosses should confirm if they tried to establish whether or not Edwards was guilty of the crimes he was accused, adding: ‘You can’t justify paying him beyond November if you know he’s guilty.’
Speaking on his self-titled Channel 5 chat show, the 59-year-old said: ‘We need to find out if BBC said, what (were you arrested) for and are you guilty?
‘If he said to them, “It’s for these serious offences, but I’m not guilty,” then I would think you could start to take action to get the money back.
‘Because that clearly is a lie. He’s admitted he’s guilty.
‘I don’t know whether the BBC asked him “Are you guilty?” because you can’t justify paying him beyond November if you know he’s guilty.’
He added: ‘The information may have come from an intermediary who says I’ve got no more information than this – Huw has been arrested.’
He continued: ‘What a mess and the poor BBC at the centre. It has terrible moments, but there are precious reasons why we don’t want it to go down the swanny.
‘This is not the day to defend it because this is a bad, bad week. I couldn’t believe yesterday when I heard that the BBC had been told about it in November.’
Asked if the BBC should try to recoup the money paid to Edwards following his arrest, former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond told Vine’s programme: ‘Frankly, if Huw has any dignity left then he would hand some of the money back, certainly the 200 grand he has made since his arrest. I think it would be gracious of him to do that.’
She added: ‘We need to remember the BBC as a whole is being tarnished and reputationally this is very very damaging of course. But the news division is quite rightly and thankfully quite separate from the corporation itself.
‘It’s quite a hard division for people to make but we in the news have without fear or favour questioned the bosses at the BBC and that is entirely right.
‘In the newsroom themselves they were kept in the dark right until this week, which is extraordinary.’
Edwards was bailed after pleading guilty on Wednesday and will next appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on September 16.
Metro.co.uk has approached the BBC for comment.
Hot Property Picks from Metro
70s icon's neighbour finally sells London's most derelict house for £2,000,000
Full list of Halloween street names that could make you £70,000 richer
I sold my £2,000,000 Omaze house — the best thing about it was the lawnmower
£900,000 house where every wall is a mirror has people saying the same thing
What I Own: I paid the deposit for my £320,000 Isleworth one-bed by borrowing from my boss
This Morning airs weekdays from 10am on ITV1.
Got a story?
If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us [email protected], calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.
MORE : The ‘problem’ BBC could face deleting historic Huw Edwards TV footage
MORE : BBC is ‘still paying for therapy’ for woman who complained twice about Huw Edwards
MORE : Why is Matt Baker commentating on Olympic gymnastics?
Share this with