Talk:Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees

December 2022

Why does it say Mike Peel 'reappointed'? As far as I know this is his first tour on the board following his 2022 election by the community. Kudpung (talk) 17:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Typo, fixed as soon as it was published --ELappen (WMF) (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikimania 16.-19. August 2023 [ 2023-08-16]

Zum Schutz von wikipedia (und Ähnlichem) & allen freiwillig 'Zeit Investierenden' ist es notwendig 1 zentrale 'Stelle' für ein effizientes & eineindeutiges [one-to-one] Beschwerde - Management zu implementieren. Insbesondere um das in letzter Zeit häufige & häufig nicht-begründete 'Zurücksetzen & Rückgängigmachen' raumzeitlich-zeiträumlich zu beschränken vor dem Hintergrund des Energiesparens, ..., Transaktionen-Reduktion etc.. Copy-Schutz, ..., eine Datenbank für Kopien:

Es darf nicht n u r alles aus der Wikipedia-Werk - Perspektive gesehen werden, sondern sollte auch optimal in freundlich gesinnter Atmosphäre aus der Wikipedia-Inhaltgeber - Perspektive sein ( sogenannte nicht-umständliche, nicht-bürokratische Benutzerfreundlichkeit).

Große Probleme tauchen auch bei den Meta-Ebenen der Translationsdienste auf, da unterschiedliche grammatikalische Konstrukte unterschiedlicher Sprachen unterschiedliche Satz-Bausteine & deren Anordnung hervorrufen.

Insbesondere sollte man versierten sprachwissenschaftlich* erfahrenen Informatikern einen größeren Aktionsradius zugestehen. Und davon wiederum insbesondere denen der Alt-Sprachen (- > Spiegelungsproblematik). Uazt (talk) 03:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Incubator:Wikinews projects

Hi, it seems like the Language Committee is not functioning properly, possibly due to understaffing or the majority of members being inactive and not engaging with the Incubator communities. It's possible that many of the members are not interested in smaller Wikimedia projects outside of Wikipedia. In light of this, I request that the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees create a separate committee for small wikis. Currently, according to the Language Proposal Policy and general guidelines, a project must demonstrate activity by having 3+ users active for 3+ months. Our Wikinews project (Requests for new languages/Wikinews Sylheti) has been active for 12+ months, but no action has been taken by Langcom. Please consider my proposal to create a separate committee for smaller wikis. -- ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 08:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

If the Language Committee is understaffed or has too many inactive members, why do you think a second committee will have enough active members? It would be more effective to simply encourage more users to join the existing committee. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 20:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)