Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions
→Removal of access: + 1 |
|||
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
At user's own request. [[User:PG|PG]] ([[User talk:PG|talk]]) 18:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC) |
At user's own request. [[User:PG|PG]] ([[User talk:PG|talk]]) 18:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
:Done. --<small>[[User:MF-Warburg|MF-W]]</small> 08:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
:Done. --<small>[[User:MF-Warburg|MF-W]]</small> 08:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
==== JAn Dudík@cs.wiktionary ==== |
|||
{{sr-request |
|||
|status = <!--don't change this line--> |
|||
|domain = cs.wiktionary |
|||
|user name = JAn Dudík |
|||
|discussion= https://cs.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wikislovn%C3%ADk:Spr%C3%A1vci/Potvrzov%C3%A1n%C3%AD_pr%C3%A1v_spr%C3%A1vce_JAn_Dud%C3%ADk |
|||
}} |
|||
— [[User:Danny B.|Danny B.]] 16:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
=== Miscellaneous requests === |
=== Miscellaneous requests === |
Revision as of 16:29, 19 July 2016
This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure. Minimum voting requirement are listed here.
Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.
- Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
- If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
- For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type
!steward
in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type@steward
for non-urgent help.
Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.
Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Using this page
1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:
==== Username@xxproject ==== {{sr-request |status = <!-- Don't change this line --> |domain = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks --> |user name = |discussion= }} (your remarks) ~~~~
2. Fill in the values:
- domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
- user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
- discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).
3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.
Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement
Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.
Requests
Administrator access
See Administrator for information about this user group.
- If you are requesting adminship to handle one time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Steward requests/Miscellaneous.
- MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
- Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-adminconnect.
- Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.
Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.
Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.
- Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
- If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.
Liridon@sqwikiquote
- Wiki: sq.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Liridon (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: q:sq:Wikiquote:Kuvendi#Privilegje_te_Administratorit
I request temporary admin rights in this projekt, since the community is very little active, and I cant find someone there to vote for Admin rights, I made an announcement, in Village Pump. Liridon (talk) 10:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- {{on hold}} until 19 July 2016 (one week) since I see you posted the notification today. —MarcoAurelio 11:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-10-19. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. ~ Nahid Talk 08:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- @NahidSultan: Thanks.--Liridon (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-10-19. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. ~ Nahid Talk 08:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
SimmeD@dawikiquote
- Wiki: da.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: SimmeD (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Da.Wikiquote Discussion
This is my 6 application. Thanks. SimmeD (talk) 21:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- {{on hold}} until 19 July 2016 (one week) since you posted the notification today. MBisanz talk 11:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-07-19. ~ Nahid Talk 08:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
अनिरुद्ध!@hiwiki
- Wiki: hi.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: अनिरुद्ध! (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: RfA
7 vote for support plus his own vote=8 vote for support and 3 vote for against. 80% support so please grant admin right. His last adminship period is permanent.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 05:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Steward, in Local RFA one of Admin named Mala chaubey close this RFA as undone. She is opposite voter and no right to decide result.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 06:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- admin mala chaubey moved this nomination to archive page and block me on hiwiki. Bcoz i have rollback her edit. Need action by steward.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 07:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- I doubt that there was a consensus to promote. Ruslik (talk) 20:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yesterday we started new RfA. So please hold on. This RFA for permanent adminship.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 08:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, I request the stewards to kindly note that earlier poll ran between 4-16 July which was unsuccessful because User:अनिरुद्ध! could not secure the much needed 80% votes. Therefore a hasty re-poll effort is rather illogical. However, I also oppose any effort to block User:YmKavishwar as I view him to be a dedicated editor. Therefore, please close the poll issue as "not done" and at the same time protect User:YmKavishwar from any unwarranted block. --Muzammil (talk) 13:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yesterday we started new RfA. So please hold on. This RFA for permanent adminship.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 08:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I doubt that there was a consensus to promote. Ruslik (talk) 20:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- admin mala chaubey moved this nomination to archive page and block me on hiwiki. Bcoz i have rollback her edit. Need action by steward.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 07:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Bureaucrat access
- In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
- A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.
Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.
CheckUser access
- To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
- One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.
- Stewards: Before granting this permission to a user, please check the current policy and make sure that the user has signed the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. An email template is available for requesting new users to identify.
- When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list. Subscription to checkuser-l will be handled by list owners. Make sure new users contact an op for access to #wikimedia-privacyconnect and #wikimedia-checkuserconnect.
Oversight access
- To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
- For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
- Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .
- Stewards: Before granting this permission to a user, please check the current policy and make sure that the user has signed the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation.
- When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.
Removal of access
- If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
- To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
- To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
- See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.
Amonet@sk.wikipedia
- Wiki: sk.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Amonet (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: per local rule sk:Wikipédia:Pravidlá/Pravidlo o správcoch#Nezáujem o výkon funkcie
I ask to remove sysop flag on skwiki for Amonet. Reason: per local rule: she does not have edit in articles for last 4 months. Vasiľ (talk) 08:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- "Za neaktívneho správcu sa považuje taký správca, ktorý nevykonal žiadny správcovský úkon za posledné 4 kalendárne mesiace.". Does it mean that an admin who didn't perform any admin actions for last 4 months will lose their admin access?--Stryn (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Whole section is:
- Správcovi, ktorý je neaktívny ako správca alebo ako redaktor stewardi odoberú správcovské právomoci. (translation: Sysop which is not active as a sysop or a user will stewards removed sysop acces.)
- Za neaktívneho správcu sa považuje taký správca, ktorý nevykonal žiadny správcovský úkon za posledné 4 kalendárne mesiace. (translation: Not active sysop is sysop, which did no performed sysop edit in last 4 months)
- Za neaktívneho redaktora sa považuje taký redaktor, ktorý nevykonal žiadnu úpravu v hlavnom mennom priestore za posledné 4 kalendárne mesiace. (translation: Not active user is user, which did no performed edit in articles in last 4 months)
- Whole section is:
- In this case it is removal of sysop flag, because sysop is inactive as a user. Vasiľ (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Is there something missing in this request? Vasiľ (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I believe the user in question deleted a page on March 30. Wouldn't that extend the period until July 30? MBisanz talk 03:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, she performed deletion. But she did not performed edit in articles since March 16. In rule on sk wiki (part of it I translated here) is written, that steward will removed sysop flag if:
- user did not performed sysop action for 4 months or (it means en:Logical disjunction, not en:Logical conjunction)
- user did not performed edit in articles for 4 month.
- This second option is valid in case of Amonet. Vasiľ (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Vasiľ: Is there a community consensus for approving that policy? Most of the inactivity policy require user being notified regarding the removal. I don't see any notification at the user's talk page. ~ Nahid Talk 08:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- sk:Wikipédia:Pravidlá/Pravidlo o správcoch is valid rule of sk wiki, which was approved in sk:Diskusia k Wikipédii:Pravidlá/Pravidlo o správcoch#Hlasovanie.
- In rule is written: "O odobratie právomoci správcovi, ktorý spĺňa stanovené kritériá na jej odobratie, môže stewardov požiadať ktorýkoľvek redaktor, ako keby o odobratie práv požiadal správca sám." Which means, that anyone can ask stewards to remove sysop flag, if sysop has reach criteria for removal of sysop acces.
- There is no obligation to notify Amonet. Vasiľ (talk) 08:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Well, As we have some bad experience regarding this type of confusion, I believe it'd be better to have another user's comment from skwik and I just asked the only bureaucrat of skwiki for second opinion. ~ Nahid Talk 10:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Vasiľ: Is there a community consensus for approving that policy? Most of the inactivity policy require user being notified regarding the removal. I don't see any notification at the user's talk page. ~ Nahid Talk 08:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Few years ago wasn't problem with such a request [1], [2]. But OK, I unterstand that you need to check it. I saw your question on sk. Vasiľ (talk) 10:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- There is this rule on skwiki: if sysop did not performed any edit in articles for 4 month or did not performed any sysop action for 4 months, stewards will remove his sysop permissions. Vasiľ is right. --Exestosik (talk) 10:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I am a bit perplex about this request. This comment "Yes, she performed deletion. But she did not performed edit in articles" is concerning. Is a deletion not an edit? The user deleted a page on March 30 as MBisanz rightfully pointed out. Do you mean in sk:Wiki, a page deletion does not count as edit? Is the now deleted page, Gottfrid Svartholm not in mainspace when it was deleted? If a page deletion at sk:Wiki is not an edit, can we see that policy? I am sorry, such policy is illogical if it exist at all. Wikicology (talk) 14:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- There is this rule on skwiki: if sysop did not performed any edit in articles for 4 month or did not performed any sysop action for 4 months, stewards will remove his sysop permissions. Vasiľ is right. --Exestosik (talk) 10:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Slovak rule has 3 points about inactivity of admins (sk:Wikipédia:Pravidlá/Pravidlo o správcoch#Nezáujem o výkon funkcie).
- Briefly:
- Stewards will removed admin flag to admin which is no longer active as a admin or a user.
- Inactive admin is admin which did not performed admin edit in last 4 months.
- Inactive user is user which did not performed edit in article in last 4 months.
- In this case last edit in article is 16.6. 2016. So it means, that Amonet is inactive a a user. No confusion, just following rule on sk. Yes, rule divided edits into 2 groups. Vasiľ (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
While the (partially confusing) wording of the rule actually indicates, that July 16 can be the removal date, I encourage stewards to hold until July 30, which is just few more days and is the no-doubt removal date.
— Danny B. 16:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- You are wrong. Rule is clear in this case. Аs a man, which understand Slovak language you know it. No doubth removal date is Jule 16, as rule obviously states. Vasiľ (talk) 16:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Filip_em@pl.wikipedia
- Wiki: pl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Filip_em (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: [3]
At user's own request. PG (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Done. --MF-W 08:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
JAn Dudík@cs.wiktionary
- Wiki: cs.wiktionary.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: JAn Dudík (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: https://cs.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wikislovn%C3%ADk:Spr%C3%A1vci/Potvrzov%C3%A1n%C3%AD_pr%C3%A1v_spr%C3%A1vce_JAn_Dud%C3%ADk
— Danny B. 16:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Miscellaneous requests
Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.
Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:
See also
- Steward requests
- Log of changes to user rights
- Log of global rights-related changes
- Steward handbook
- Users that have signed confidentiality agreement for nonpublic personal data
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation