Property talk:P8794
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Máté in topic Scope
Documentation
BBFC reference
reference number for a film or video game (-2012) media content rating decision on BBFC's official website
reference number for a film or video game (-2012) media content rating decision on BBFC's official website
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Format, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Format, SPARQL
Type “film (Q11424), video game (Q7889)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “film (Q11424), video game (Q7889)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Type Q11424, Q7889, SPARQL
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Item P2629, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Item P2629, search, SPARQL
Scope is as reference (Q54828450), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8794#Entity types
|
|
Scope
editIf it had to be created, I would propose to change its scope from main value to qualifier, and connect directly to the ratings. Make it a subproperty of rating certificate ID (P2676). Máté (talk) 12:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- How about using it as both? @Máté: --Trade (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Trade: What purpose would that serve? As an external ID, it is totally misguided. – Máté (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- I think it makes perfect sense to link the classification decisions with the creative works that they are classifying. It's not like we haven't done that before
- @Trade: What purpose would that serve? As an external ID, it is totally misguided. – Máté (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Movies
Notified participants of WikiProject Video games Thoughts? --Trade (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Well, then use it as a qualifier. – Máté (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- We are not supposed to use qualifiers to replace references. The only reason that the property ended up as it did is because it's more stable. --Trade (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Who said anything about using it to replace references? It would replace another qualifier. References would remain intact. – Máté (talk) 10:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Moreover, BBFC reference has been depreciated. Ratings from this October on no longer have an identifier. – Máté (talk) 10:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- We are not supposed to use qualifiers to replace references. The only reason that the property ended up as it did is because it's more stable. --Trade (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Well, then use it as a qualifier. – Máté (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
@Máté:, several of the BBFC reference numbers added in November and before have started to die on me. Any idea why? --Trade (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Trade: I'll try to look it up or contact BBFC but probably it has to do with the website overhaul and the depreciation of the BBFC reference just as this property was on proposal. It would be nice if at least the redirects remained (I've already complained about the old links not working but at least the reference redirects did.) – Máté (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)