Books by Maria Gerolemou
Επανάσταση γένους, θηλυκού Αναπαραστάσεις Γυναικείας Αντισυμβατικότητας Ευριπίδη, Μήδεια και Φρίντα Κάλο
Η λογοτεχνία και οι εικαστικές τέχνες διαχωρίζουν συχνά τις γυναίκες που απεικονίζουν σε ευγενικέ... more Η λογοτεχνία και οι εικαστικές τέχνες διαχωρίζουν συχνά τις γυναίκες που απεικονίζουν σε ευγενικές και υποχωρητικές ή σε κακές και αντιδραστικές όταν δεν αποδέχονται τον έμφυλό τους από την πατριαρχία προδιαγεγραμμένο και δομημένο ρόλο. Όταν οι γυναίκες, από την άλλη, μιλούν για τις ίδιες και το φύλο τους μέσα από αυτό-αναπαραστάσεις στην τέχνη, o λόγος τους χαρακτηρίζεται πολλές φορές ως εκκεντρικός και ακατανόητος. Αποκλεισμένες χρόνια από δομές αναπαράστασης, οι γυναίκες ήταν το «άλλο φύλο» θεωρούμενες από το σύστημα κοινωνικής λογικής και οργάνωσης ως άφρονες, υστερικές ή επικίνδυνες όταν η δράση τους υπονόμευε παραδοσιακούς κοινωνικούς ρόλους. Δύο φιγούρες, η μια μυθική, από την αρχαία ελληνική μυθολογία, και η άλλη, μια πραγματική προσωπικότητα της σύγχρονης ιστορίας, η Ευριπίδεια Μήδεια και η Φρίντα Κάλο, σε διαφορετικούς τόπους και χρόνους, ενσαρκώνουν γυναικείες απόπειρες διεξόδου από το πλαίσιο των κοινωνικών περιορισμών υπογραμμίζοντας την ανάγκη αναγνώρισης της γυναικείας, αυτόνομης φωνής.
This book is a cross-disciplinary study of how people presumed missing were conceptualised across... more This book is a cross-disciplinary study of how people presumed missing were conceptualised across antiquity. It interrogates poetic texts, medical writings, archaeological material to question how ancients identified individuals in both literary, social, and archaeological contexts and, more broadly, how antiquity understands the link between presence/absence, out-of-placeness, and identity.
This book looks for the first time at notions of technical automation through three interrelated ... more This book looks for the first time at notions of technical automation through three interrelated aspects: first, It explores up to which point nature acts as an inspiration for technical automation; secondly, it discusses the consequences of technical automation in relation to human skills, and, third, it examines its role in mechanical manufacturing processes.
In Homer and Hesiod, technical automation is the result of copying the functionality of nature and, thus, it displays continuities between nature and technology. Greek theater, on the other hand, by reflecting a divide between natural and non-natural forces, invites us to abandon the unrewarding ‘natural’ condition of the human body and favor its technical automation, i.e. its restoration and enhancement, while at the same time, it underlines the problematical relationship between automaticity and the natural, specifically, whether the automatic is capable of completely replacing the human element and does not merely hold an auxiliary or a supplementary position. Finally, with the Hellenistic engineers and the advancements in technology, a new automation age begins which is primarily concerned with technical feasibility as a precondition of automation. This new type of technical automation which employs various tools interconnecting with materials and techniques in order to create a sequence of motion, suggests new methods of making that do not attempt to replace the natural ones but supplement them. Integrated further into descriptions of artifacts mechanical automation cultivates a new type of audience, one that is skilled at uncovering every hidden technical cause.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/body-and-machine-in-classical-antiquity/4368B0E31915D327552... more https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/body-and-machine-in-classical-antiquity/4368B0E31915D327552A244E0F86958D
Participants: Deborah Steiner (Columbia), Maria Gerolemou (Un. of Exeter), George Kazantzidis (Patras), Orly Lewis (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Matteo Valleriani (Max Planck Institute, Berlin) Giouli Korobili (Humboldt, Berlin), Marquis Berrey (Iowa), Isabel Ruffell (Glasgow), Jane Draycott (Glasgow), Robert Mayhew (Seton Hall), Colin Webster (UC Davis), Jean De Groot (CUA)
The aim of this volume is to explore the dialogue between the sciences of medicine and mechanics in antiquity. Iatromechanics (or iatrophysics) makes its appearance as a medical school of thought during the seventeenth century: by adopting mechanical principles for explaining human physiology, its proponents advance the view that human life can be fully explained in terms of physics. Furthermore, the volume examines the extent to which similar models of the human body can be traced in ancient medical texts (as was maintained, for the first time, in the work of Friedrich Hoffmann, 1660-1742) in relation to the increased anatomical knowledge gained through dissection and in dialogue with scientific advancements in the field of mechanics – especially from the Hellenistic period onward. At the same time, it discusses the adaptation of medical lore and discourse in mechanical texts, in contexts where engineers contrive and produce artifacts which, despite extending beyond the natural world, are still conceived in analogy with the human body and its functions. By insisting on the desired life-like qualities of its technology, ancient mechanics invokes medicine in a way that essentially blurs the line between the natural and the artificial and invites us to consider the operation of a well-crafted machine in light of the spontaneous automatisms that rule human life.
In recent years, scholars have extensively explored the function of the miraculous and wondrous i... more In recent years, scholars have extensively explored the function of the miraculous and wondrous in ancient narratives, mostly pondering on how ancient authors view wondrous accounts, i.e. the treatment of the descriptions of wondrous occurrences as true events or their use. More precisely, these narratives investigate whether the wondrous pursues a display of erudition or merely provides stylistic variety; sometimes, such narratives even represent the wish of the author to grant a “rational explanation” to extraordinary actions. At present, however, two aspects of the topic have not been fully examined: a) the ability of the wondrous/miraculous to set cognitive mechanisms in motion and b) the power of the wondrous/miraculous to contribute to the construction of an authorial identity (that of kings, gods, or narrators). To this extent, the volume approaches miracles and wonders as counter intuitive phenomena, beyond cognitive grasp, which challenge the authenticity of human experience and knowledge and push forward the frontiers of intellectual and aesthetic experience. Some of the articles of the volume examine miracles on the basis of bewilderment that could lead to new factual knowledge; the supernatural is here registered as something natural (although strange); the rest of the articles treat miracles as an endpoint, where human knowledge stops and the unknown divine begins (here the supernatural is confirmed). Thence, questions like whether the experience of a miracle or wonder as a counter intuitive phenomenon could be part of long-term memory, i.e. if miracles could be transformed into solid knowledge and what mental functions are encompassed in this process, are central in the discussion.
... Page 4. Maria Gerolemou Bad Women, Mad Women Genderund Wahnsinn in dergriechischen Tragödie P... more ... Page 4. Maria Gerolemou Bad Women, Mad Women Genderund Wahnsinn in dergriechischen Tragödie Page 5. ... Gewidmet ist das Buch meinen Eltern, die mich immer in jeder Hinsicht unterstützt haben. München, im Juli 2010 Maria Gerolemou vii Page 9. ...
Papers by Maria Gerolemou
Cambridge University Press eBooks, Jul 27, 2023
Επανάσταση γένους, θηλυκού Αναπαραστάσεις Γυναικείας Αντισυμβατικότητας Ευριπίδη, Μήδεια και Φρίντα Κάλο, 2023
Η λογοτεχνία και οι εικαστικές τέχνες διαχωρίζουν συχνά τις γυναίκες που απεικονίζουν σε ευγενικέ... more Η λογοτεχνία και οι εικαστικές τέχνες διαχωρίζουν συχνά τις γυναίκες που απεικονίζουν σε ευγενικές και υποχωρητικές ή σε κακές και αντιδραστικές όταν δεν αποδέχονται τον έμφυλό τους από την πατριαρχία προδιαγεγραμμένο και δομημένο ρόλο. Όταν οι γυναίκες, από την άλλη, μιλούν για τις ίδιες και το φύλο τους μέσα από αυτό-αναπαραστάσεις στην τέχνη, o λόγος τους χαρακτηρίζεται πολλές φορές ως εκκεντρικός και ακατανόητος. Αποκλεισμένες χρόνια από δομές αναπαράστασης, οι γυναίκες ήταν το «άλλο φύλο» θεωρούμενες από το σύστημα κοινωνικής λογικής και οργάνωσης ως άφρονες, υστερικές ή επικίνδυνες όταν η δράση τους υπονόμευε παραδοσιακούς κοινωνικούς ρόλους. Δύο φιγούρες, η μια μυθική, από την αρχαία ελληνική μυθολογία, και η άλλη, μια πραγματική προσωπικότητα της σύγχρονης ιστορίας, η Ευριπίδεια Μήδεια και η Φρίντα Κάλο, σε διαφορετικούς τόπους και χρόνους, ενσαρκώνουν γυναικείες απόπειρες διεξόδου από το πλαίσιο των κοινωνικών περιορισμών υπογραμμίζοντας την ανάγκη αναγνώρισης της γυναικείας, αυτόνομης φωνής.
This paper aims at analysing the function of memory in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis from the pe... more This paper aims at analysing the function of memory in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis from the perspective of its original conception and also with regard to a contemporary staging. The first part of the paper draws on memory in connection to the prehistory of the Trojan War. Retelling the sacrifice of Iphigenia, Euripides discusses memory as a non stable entity, which is formed by the specific social frameworks in which it operates. At the same time, the dynamics of memory are explored in the play through the examination of medial processes, as the written and oral word, through which memories come into the public arena, thus becoming collective ones. The aim of this first part, therefore, is to provide a bridge between the social dynamics of memory and the impact of medial technologies in shaping information about the past. Euripides’ dynamic understanding of memory, where individual and groups constantly reconfigure their relationship with their past, brings us to the second part...
Homer and the Good Ruler in Antiquity and Beyond, 2018
Uploads
Books by Maria Gerolemou
In Homer and Hesiod, technical automation is the result of copying the functionality of nature and, thus, it displays continuities between nature and technology. Greek theater, on the other hand, by reflecting a divide between natural and non-natural forces, invites us to abandon the unrewarding ‘natural’ condition of the human body and favor its technical automation, i.e. its restoration and enhancement, while at the same time, it underlines the problematical relationship between automaticity and the natural, specifically, whether the automatic is capable of completely replacing the human element and does not merely hold an auxiliary or a supplementary position. Finally, with the Hellenistic engineers and the advancements in technology, a new automation age begins which is primarily concerned with technical feasibility as a precondition of automation. This new type of technical automation which employs various tools interconnecting with materials and techniques in order to create a sequence of motion, suggests new methods of making that do not attempt to replace the natural ones but supplement them. Integrated further into descriptions of artifacts mechanical automation cultivates a new type of audience, one that is skilled at uncovering every hidden technical cause.
Participants: Deborah Steiner (Columbia), Maria Gerolemou (Un. of Exeter), George Kazantzidis (Patras), Orly Lewis (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Matteo Valleriani (Max Planck Institute, Berlin) Giouli Korobili (Humboldt, Berlin), Marquis Berrey (Iowa), Isabel Ruffell (Glasgow), Jane Draycott (Glasgow), Robert Mayhew (Seton Hall), Colin Webster (UC Davis), Jean De Groot (CUA)
The aim of this volume is to explore the dialogue between the sciences of medicine and mechanics in antiquity. Iatromechanics (or iatrophysics) makes its appearance as a medical school of thought during the seventeenth century: by adopting mechanical principles for explaining human physiology, its proponents advance the view that human life can be fully explained in terms of physics. Furthermore, the volume examines the extent to which similar models of the human body can be traced in ancient medical texts (as was maintained, for the first time, in the work of Friedrich Hoffmann, 1660-1742) in relation to the increased anatomical knowledge gained through dissection and in dialogue with scientific advancements in the field of mechanics – especially from the Hellenistic period onward. At the same time, it discusses the adaptation of medical lore and discourse in mechanical texts, in contexts where engineers contrive and produce artifacts which, despite extending beyond the natural world, are still conceived in analogy with the human body and its functions. By insisting on the desired life-like qualities of its technology, ancient mechanics invokes medicine in a way that essentially blurs the line between the natural and the artificial and invites us to consider the operation of a well-crafted machine in light of the spontaneous automatisms that rule human life.
Papers by Maria Gerolemou
In Homer and Hesiod, technical automation is the result of copying the functionality of nature and, thus, it displays continuities between nature and technology. Greek theater, on the other hand, by reflecting a divide between natural and non-natural forces, invites us to abandon the unrewarding ‘natural’ condition of the human body and favor its technical automation, i.e. its restoration and enhancement, while at the same time, it underlines the problematical relationship between automaticity and the natural, specifically, whether the automatic is capable of completely replacing the human element and does not merely hold an auxiliary or a supplementary position. Finally, with the Hellenistic engineers and the advancements in technology, a new automation age begins which is primarily concerned with technical feasibility as a precondition of automation. This new type of technical automation which employs various tools interconnecting with materials and techniques in order to create a sequence of motion, suggests new methods of making that do not attempt to replace the natural ones but supplement them. Integrated further into descriptions of artifacts mechanical automation cultivates a new type of audience, one that is skilled at uncovering every hidden technical cause.
Participants: Deborah Steiner (Columbia), Maria Gerolemou (Un. of Exeter), George Kazantzidis (Patras), Orly Lewis (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Matteo Valleriani (Max Planck Institute, Berlin) Giouli Korobili (Humboldt, Berlin), Marquis Berrey (Iowa), Isabel Ruffell (Glasgow), Jane Draycott (Glasgow), Robert Mayhew (Seton Hall), Colin Webster (UC Davis), Jean De Groot (CUA)
The aim of this volume is to explore the dialogue between the sciences of medicine and mechanics in antiquity. Iatromechanics (or iatrophysics) makes its appearance as a medical school of thought during the seventeenth century: by adopting mechanical principles for explaining human physiology, its proponents advance the view that human life can be fully explained in terms of physics. Furthermore, the volume examines the extent to which similar models of the human body can be traced in ancient medical texts (as was maintained, for the first time, in the work of Friedrich Hoffmann, 1660-1742) in relation to the increased anatomical knowledge gained through dissection and in dialogue with scientific advancements in the field of mechanics – especially from the Hellenistic period onward. At the same time, it discusses the adaptation of medical lore and discourse in mechanical texts, in contexts where engineers contrive and produce artifacts which, despite extending beyond the natural world, are still conceived in analogy with the human body and its functions. By insisting on the desired life-like qualities of its technology, ancient mechanics invokes medicine in a way that essentially blurs the line between the natural and the artificial and invites us to consider the operation of a well-crafted machine in light of the spontaneous automatisms that rule human life.
Topics covered in this wide-ranging collection include: cognitive linguistics applied to Homeric and early Greek texts, Roman cultural semantics, linguistic embodiment in Latin literature, group identities in Greek lyric, cognitive dissonance in historiography, kinesthetic empathy in Sappho, artificial intelligence in Hesiod and Greek drama, the enactivism of Roman statues and memory and art in the Roman Empire.
This ground-breaking work is the first to organize the field, allowing both scholars and students access to the methodologies, bibliographies and techniques of the cognitive sciences and how they have been applied to classics.
Speakers: Karen Ni Mheallaigh (Exeter), Daniel King (Exeter), Jane Draycott (Glasgow), Martin Devecka (UC Santa Cruz), Giulia Maria Ches (HU Berlin), Francesca Spiegel (HU, Berlin), Laurence Totelin (Gardiff), Alessia Guardasole (CNRS, Paris), Genevieve Liveley (Bristol)].
(Deadline: 28. February 2017)
Mirrors (or reflecting surfaces) and their symbolism in classical Antiquity have been investigated to a certain degree by scholars who work with representation, duplication and reflexivity. The figure of the mirror as means of reflection of the self (autoscopy), i.e. as means of perceiving, evaluating and knowing the self, or as reflection of the other, as well as in regard to their metaphorical use as agents of transformation, has also received some attention (cf. Frontisi-Ducroux and Vernant 1997; Bartsch 2006, Taylor 2010; Stang 2016). However, there has been less emphasis on mirrors as artifacts that function as means for conceptualizing reality in Antiquity, as well as on comparative analyses between ancient and modern uses (Anderson 2008). Our focus is on research areas that relate to the concept of mirrors as reflecting media and as material objects, on mirroring as a process of production or reproduction of the physical object (ancient theories of optics in general and of catoptrics in particular), and on reflections as virtual images. While we invite proposals from the realms of art, literature, history, archaeology, philosophy and science on any aspect of the following subjects, these are by no means exhaustive. • How does a mirror work? Beside the common visual registration of an action or inaction, in a two dimensional and reversed form, various types of mirrors possess special abilities which can produce a distorted picture of reality, creating illusions and falsehood (speculum fallax); for instance, some mirrors shrink or enlarge their objects, others create three-dimensional copies (concave and convex mirrors). Oracular mirrors and magical mirrors, as well as mirrors revealing the divine will be also taken into consideration. In this vein, mirrors are actually explored as prosthetics that allow us to look where the eye cannot reach (cf. Eco 1983). • What do we see in a mirror? Mirror images are not thought to be the product of a perspicuous reflection of a physical object. They are the products of the interrelationship between the action of viewing and the reflected object. Contributions on visual process are welcome from both the lens of geometrical optics as well as from a philosophical point of view (cf. Smith 2015, Squire 2016). We are also open to papers representing under-researched aspects of the figural usage of mirrors and mirroring e.g. mirrors and mise en abîme, mirroring and textual replications etc. Papers presentations, which must be in English, will be 30 minutes long, followed by 15 minutes of discussion. We welcome proposals from advanced PhD students and early career researchers, as well as more established scholars. Please send an abstract of 300 words by 28 February 2017 to both of the two organizers: Maria Gerolemou ([email protected]), Lilia Diamantopoulou ([email protected]). We will acknowledge receipt of all abstracts, and we expect to reach a decision by the end of March. In the meantime, please feel free to contact either of us for further information. The conference will be hosted by the University of Vienna. Speakers will have to make their own arrangements for their travel and accommodation.
Be about it and talk it through with us at UCL on July 9th!
https://greekepic_ai_oslo.eventbrite.co.uk
(follow this link for free registration and access to the Zoom login details)
https://www.hf.uio.no/ifikk/english/about/ (IFIKK)
https://www.hf.uio.no/ifikk/english/research/groups/novel-and-epic-ancient-and-modern/index.html (NEAM)
https://www.hf.uio.no/ifikk/english/research/groups/novel-and-epic-ancient-and-modern/greek-epic---ai_oslo_sep-2020_-programme.pdf