With increasing perturbation duration, i.e., amplitude, EMG response increased but reflex gain decreased due to the inert period after M1, which is believed to ...

Abstract—Linear system identification methods combined with neuromechanical modeling enables the quantification of reflex gains from recorded joint angular ...

Displacements that last longer than the M1 response (approximately 22ms in this study) will result in a model output that covers part of the refractory period ...

Reduction of the Linear Reflex Gain Explained From the M1–M2 Refractory Period · A. Klomp, E. Vlugt, +3 authors F. C. T. Helm · Published in IEEE Transactions on…

The goal of the present study is to assess to what extent linear assumptions hold when quantifying these reflexive responses. Series of ramp-and-hold angular ...

With increasing perturbation duration, i.e., amplitude, EMG response increased but reflex gain decreased due to the inert period after M1, which is believed to ...

Reduction of the linear reflex gain explained from the M1¿M2 refractory period. Journal article (2013). Authors. A. Klomp Biomechatronics & Human-Machine ...

Reduction of the Linear Reflex Gain Explained From the M1-M2 Refractory Period ; All authors: Klomp, A.; Vlugt, E. de; Meskers, C.G.M.; Groot, J.H. de; Arendzen, ...

For longer angular perturba- tions, the reduction in activity in the period between M1 and. M2 explained the decrease in reflex gain, which is also an often.

Leiden University Scholarly Publications · Exit statistics · Statistics of Reduction of the Linear Reflex Gain Explained From the M1-M2 Refractory Period.