scholar.google.com › citations
Jun 7, 2017 · We theoretically and empirically investigate the limits of improvement in effectiveness from using mutation reduction strategies compared to ...
Mutation Reduction Strategies Considered Harmful. Rahul Gopinath∗, Iftekhar ... mutation reduction strategies is to aim for including as many different faults.
It is found that none of the mutation reduction strategies evaluated—many forms of operator selection, and stratified sampling (on operators or program ...
Researchers have proposed numerous mutation reduction strategies in order to reduce the high cost of mutation analysis, while preserving the representativeness ...
We find that none of the mutation reduction strategies evaluated – many forms of operator selection, and stratified sampling (on operators or program elements) ...
Mutation Reduction Strategies Considered Harmful · IEEE Transactions on Reliability 66(3): 854-874 · 2017 · Related Documents · Quick Search · Content · Social Media.
elements, and found that an accuracy of 92% is achieved while reducing the number of mutants by 80%. A similar mutation reduction strategy is to cluster similar.
Missing: Harmful. | Show results with:Harmful.
Mutation Reduction Strategies Considered Harmful. Rahul Gopinath, Iftekhar Ahmed, Mohammad Amin Alipour, Carlos Jensen, Alex Groce. January 2017. PDF DOI. Type.
... Mutation Reduction Strategies Considered Harmful. 6. Mutation reduction strategies in test suite quality measurement have a limited effectiveness advantage ...
Our basic claim is that an easy way to evaluate a mutant reduction strategy is to see if it promotes test suites with a large number of non-redundant test ...
Missing: Harmful. | Show results with:Harmful.