Breadth is favoured over depth for structured menus. Breadth and depth are equally favoured for unstructured menus. Guidelines are given regarding acceptable combinations of breadth and depth for menus used in a driving context.
We investigate the design of menu hierarchies for in-vehicle user-interfaces. Breadth is favoured over depth for structured menus.
Oct 22, 2024 · The design of visual menus for automotive displays influences visual demand; structured menus favor breadth over depth, and unstructured menus ...
Designing Touchscreen Menu Interfaces for In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems: the Effect of Depth and Breadth Trade-off and Task Types on Visual-Manual Distraction.
Moreover, results indicated that for structured menus breadth was favoured over depth, as the lowest visual demand was associated with 16 Â 3 menu hierarchies.
... interface styles [2]. A key design issue for menus concerns the depth vs. breadth trade-off within a hierarchical tree structure. Designers will commonly ...
Moreover, results indicated that for structured menus breadth was favoured over depth, as the lowest visual demand was associated with 16 × 3 menu hierarchies.
Apr 17, 2024 · Depth and breadth trade-offs for structured navigation have been studied. However, little is known on how secondary task characteristics ...
Depth (the number of menu levels) varied from one to six, while breadth (the number of choices per menu) varied from two to 64. Goal acquisition time for the ...
Missing: trade- off.
Menu hierarchies for in-vehicle user-interfaces: modelling the depth vs. breadth trade-off. Type. D - Journal article. DOI. 10.1016/j.displa.2013.07.001. Title ...