This paper serves as a presentation to the 2005 evaluation campaign and introduction to the results provided in the fol- lowing papers. 1. GOALS. Last year ...

This year's campaign consists of three parts: it features two real world blind tests (anatomy and directory) in addition to the systematic benchmark test suite.

Oct 2, 2005 · General conclusion. Introduction to the Ontology Alignment Evaluation. 2005. Jérôme Euzenat. Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Mikalai Yatsevich euzenat ...

This year's campaign will consist of three parts: it will feature two real world blind tests (anatomy and directory) and a systematic benchmark test suite.

Introduction to the ontology alignment evaluation 2005. M. Yatskevich J. Euzenat H. Stuckenschmidt. Book Title. In Proceedings of Workshop on Integrating ...

Title: Introduction to the ontology alignment evaluation 2005. Workshop URL: integrating-ontologies.html. Name of Workshop: Integrating Ontologies.

Missing: Introduction | Show results with:Introduction

In this paper, we report results and lessons learned from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI), a benchmarking initiative for ontology matching.

We first provide the basic definitions of align- ments, semantics, precision and recall as well as a motivating example (§2). We then present the framework for ...

This paper proposes the KitAMO framework for comparative evaluation of ontology alignment strategies and their combinations and presents the current ...