This semantics fosters a compositional, hence more scalable, approach for enacting processes with OR-Joins. The two semantics are proved to be equivalent because each execution step of the global semantics corresponds to one or more steps of the local semantics and vice versa.
Dec 22, 2017 · In this work we instead provide direct, global and local, formalisations compliant with the OR-Join semantics reported in the BPMN 2.0 standard.
Their semantics is based on the interleaving of rule applications and calls to imported units. In this note, they are generalized in such a way that they can be ...
The local semantics is devised to more efficiently determine the OR-Join enablement and the soundness of the approach is given by demonstrating the ...
We discuss and formalize the BPMN OR-Join semantics, comparing a global and a local characterizations through experimental studies.
Mar 1, 2022 · Through validation experiments conducted on the implementations of the local and global semantics of the OR-Join, we have shown that the local ...
Semantic Scholar extracted view of "BPMN 2.0 OR-Join Semantics: Global and local characterisation" by F. Corradini et al.
People also ask
What are the different types of BPMN connectors?
What are the different types of BPMN nodes?
What are BPMN 2.0 standards?
Is BPMN obsolete?
Global vs. Local Semantics of BPMN 2.0 OR-Join. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_23 ·. Journal: SOFSEM 2018: Theory and Practice of Computer Science ...
In this work we instead provide direct, global and local, formalisations compliant with the OR-Join semantics reported in the BPMN 2.0 standard. In particular, ...
Through validation experiments conducted on the implementations of the local and global semantics of the OR-Join, we have shown that the local semantics more ...