×
Feb 17, 2010 · The models are parameterized for throughput, energy, and bandwidth. The models share common parameters for different pipeline protocols and ...
One can determine when asynchronous communication is superior at the physical level to synchronous communication in terms of energy for a given bandwidth by ...
People also ask
Abstract—Communication costs, which have the potential to throttle design performance as scaling continues, are mathemati- cally modeled and compared for ...
Comparing Energy and Latency of Asynchronous and Synchronous NoCs for Embedded SoCs · Comparison of channel protocols for low latency , low energy communication ...
One can determine when asynchronous communication is superior at the physical level to synchronous communication in terms of energy for a given bandwidth by ...
One can determine when asynchronous communication is superior at the physical level to synchronous communication in terms of energy for a given bandwidth by ...
The paper focuses on communication costs which have the potential to throttle design performance as scaling continues. The models can also be applied to logic.
Energy and Performance Models for Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication. Kenneth S. Stevens, Pankaj Golani, Peter A. Beerel.
Parameterized first-order models for throughput, energy, and bandwidth are presented in this paper. Models are de- veloped for many common pipeline ...
First-order models are created for common pipeline protocols, including clocked flopped, clocked time-borrowing latch, asynchronous two-phase, four-phase, delay ...