Comparison of UPF acceleration technologies and their tail-latency ...
ieeexplore.ieee.org › document
In this work, we compare modern packet processing acceleration technologies such as XDP, DPDK, and P4 and their respective tail-latency performance.
In this paper, we compared the tail-latencies achievable with different packet processing technologies.
The study in [56] reports a latency reduction of 77% compared to common software implementations, while [61] shows a drop of 3.75x compared to a host based UPF ...
People also ask
What latency is needed for 5G URLLC?
What is the ultra low latency of 5G?
Comparison of UPF acceleration technologies and their tail-latency for URLLC. This repository contains the source code used for measurements, data analysis ...
2023. Comparison of UPF acceleration technologies and their tail-latency for URLLC. J Rischke, C Vielhaus, P Sossalla, J Wang, FHP Fitzek. 2022 IEEE Conference ...
Aug 5, 2024 · Comparison of UPF acceleration technologies and their tail-latency for URLLC. NFV-SDN 2022: 19-25; 2020. [j2]. view. electronic edition via DOI ...
Nov 18, 2024 · URLLC aims to deliver a 0.5 ms latency of both uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) channels (1 ms round trip) with a reliabil- ity higher than 99.99 ...
Aug 23, 2024 · P4 implementations in terms of reduced tail latency. In this ... other UPF technologies are being considered. B. VPP-Based UPF. Vector ...
Aug 4, 2023 · ... acceleration technologies in uRLLC scenarios. In their study, they implemented UPF surrogates to handle GTP processes for each technology.
Comparison of UPF acceleration technologies and their tail-latency for URLLC ... This work compares modern packet processing acceleration technologies such ...