Thus, our protocols provide the best of both worlds, where the 1/p- security is only a fall-back option if there is no honest majority. 1 Introduction. A ...
Jul 16, 2020 · Thus, our protocols provide the best of both worlds, where the 1/p-security is only a fall-back option if there is no honest majority. This is a ...
Thus, our protocols provide the best of both worlds, where the 1/p-security is only a fall-back option if there is no honest majority. Download to read the full ...
However, if only a minority of the parties are honest, then our protocols are 1/p-secure. Thus, our protocols provide the best of both worlds, where the 1/p- ...
However, if only a minority of the parties are honest, then our protocols are 1/ p -secure. Thus, our protocols provide the best of both worlds, where the 1/ p ...
For two parties, they construct 1/p-secure protocols for functionalities for which the size of either their domain or their range is polynomial (in the security ...
1/p-Secure Multiparty Computation without Honest Majority and the Best of Both Worlds ... In CRYPTO 2011, Springer (LNCS 6841), pages 277-296, 2011.
Two settings are traditionally considered for secure multiparty computation, depending on whether or not a majority of the parties are assumed to be honest.
People also ask
What is a secure multi party computation?
What is an example of a multiparty computation?
What is the SMPC algorithm?
What is secure multi party computation for hide privacy design strategy?
Dive into the research topics of '1/p -Secure Multiparty Computation without an Honest Majority and the Best of Both Worlds'. Together they form a unique ...
Two settings are traditionally considered for secure multiparty computation, depending on whether or not a majority of the parties are assumed to be honest.