You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
And the table explaining the equivalents of the one component values maps:
center -> center center
<length> -> <length> center
Both of those mappings indicates that a valid value for an offset-position-v of center or <length> will be interpreted as an offset-position-h. So in those cases the spec is actively misleading in suggesting that a vertical offset value can be used on its own.
The only one component values that are unambiguously vertical positions are top and bottom. Rather than handling those two specific values (which I guess would be rarely used because mostly authors leave a gap at the top or the bottom of the root container region), for simplicity I propose that we remove offset-position-v from the permitted set of one component values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Rather than dropping single value top and bottom, I suggest we replace offset-position-v with edge-keyword-v in this context, which will make this an editorial change only.
See also #711 and #769.
Currently two options are available for one component
<position>
values:And the table explaining the equivalents of the one component values maps:
center
->center center
<length>
-><length> center
Both of those mappings indicates that a valid value for an
offset-position-v
ofcenter
or<length>
will be interpreted as anoffset-position-h
. So in those cases the spec is actively misleading in suggesting that a vertical offset value can be used on its own.The only one component values that are unambiguously vertical positions are
top
andbottom
. Rather than handling those two specific values (which I guess would be rarely used because mostly authors leave a gap at the top or the bottom of the root container region), for simplicity I propose that we removeoffset-position-v
from the permitted set of one component values.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: