We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mix()
<declaration-value>
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#interpolate
mix( <percentage> ';' <start-value> ';' <end-value> ) <start-value> The value at the “start” (0%) of the interpolation range. <end-value> The value at the “end” (100%) of the interpolation range.
mix( <percentage> ';' <start-value> ';' <end-value> )
<start-value>
<end-value>
It doesn't say what's the grammar for <start-value> and <end-value>.
I think they should be defined to be equivalent to <declaration-value>, or just use <declaration-value> directly.
Related: #8091
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Aside:
I think w3c/reffy is not able to extract its production rule because its syntax does not have the usual structure <name> = rule, ie:
w3c/reffy
<name> = rule
instead of:
<mix()> = mix( <percentage> ';' <start-value> ';' <end-value> )
Do you want this simplified form to be recognized by w3c/reffy?
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think they should be defined to be equivalent to <declaration-value>
Yes.
No, we should fix the markup.
[css-values-4] Use <decl-value> for mix(). Fix the grammar. Remove ve…
845cbe3
…rsion from css-values-5. #8096
No branches or pull requests
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#interpolate
It doesn't say what's the grammar for
<start-value>
and<end-value>
.I think they should be defined to be equivalent to
<declaration-value>
, or just use<declaration-value>
directly.Related: #8091
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: