-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[css-multicol] pseudo-algorithm refers to "track size", terminology not already used in the spec #3649
Comments
Referring to columns would seem more appropriate there. Unless the meaning is intended to be different somehow, in which case we really need a definition :) |
I think this should be columns, I don't see any reason to say tracks, so I suggest that we edit this to say:
I'll add it to the agenda of a future call as it was put in there based on a resolution. |
The CSS Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<dael> tOPIC: pseudo-algorithm refers to "track size", terminology not already used in the spec<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/3649 <dael> rachelandrew: Reading spec with authors. This is the first time track size mentioned in spec. Aim was to unify how sizing works but tracks isn't useful for multicol. Wanted to bring up since it was added with a resolution. I put sample wording in the issue <dael> astearns: Not changing effect of resolution, just hte term? <dael> rachelandrew: Yeah <dael> florian: I've looked at that and if you assume tracks=columns it's clear but if you leave the two terms it confuses everything <dael> astearns: Objections? <fantasai> sgtm <dael> RESOLVED: Accept the change in https://github.com//issues/3649 (refer to columns not tracks) |
In a workshop with a group of authors it was noted that the pseudo-algorithm (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-multicol-1/#pseudo-algorithm) refers to track size. However this is the first time that tracks are mentioned in the multicol spec.
This was added based on this resolution, to unify grid and flexbox. However it seems that we need to define tracks somewhere as the sudden appearance of this stood out to authors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: