-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Connected CW complexes #1133
Connected CW complexes #1133
Conversation
Pasting lemmas would be really nice to have. Is this PR ready for merging? |
I agree:-) I think this one is for Anders to review but he's on parental leave. But let's ping him just to harass him a bit ;-) @mortberg |
No, anyone could do it I guess. It's a project that Anders is part of which is why I thought it'd be easier if he did it. But it doesn't matter to me. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool stuff!
We have only some minor requests for more comments/renamings.
@felixwellen Thanks for reviewing! I think I've seen to all the comments now. |
Yes, great! |
This PR introduces the notion of an n-connected CW complex (in terms of trivial lower skeleta).
makeConnectedCW
inCW.Connected
which says that this is (merely) implied by the usual definition of connectedness. This is the main component of the proof of the Hurewicz theorem that I have in mind -- ping @rwbarton @owen-fool (we still need some other stuff first though).HITS.Pushout
.