Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 May 20

< May 19	May 21 >

May 20

File:Stanley kaoni nzdf 2002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image is tagged historic fair use, but the usage fails WP:NFCC#8 as the event depicted in the image is not the subject of sourced commentary, nor is the image itself the subject of sourced commentary. Additionally, this image appears to be used merely to illustrate what the subject looks like, which is a no-no for fair use images per WP:NFCC#1. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yay new camera 151.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete G7. —GFOLEY FOUR— 03:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want this picture on here. innappropriate and it is unencyclopedic. Angelica engleman (talk) 02:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PIC-0104.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Placard from a museum display. Likely that the text and image are copyrighted, however even if they are not, the image is low quality and the text is all stuff that should be in the article proper anyways. Orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PIC-tramvaji01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image of an unidentified train. Uploader has not been around for over a year. Not used in the article space. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's apparently a train of the "Satra II" line in Sarajevo [1]. Consider move to Commons, as at least a few Wikipedias have dedicated articles on that tram line (e.g. pl:Satra_II). Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glee-funeral 341x512.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fails NFCC #1 as it is totally unnecessary and amounts to decoration. 68.35.40.154 (talk) 04:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PIC00103.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'with permission of artist' but no OTRS smells of elderberries. Also, orphaned, and no information on actual artist. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Original uploaded hi-res is on desitunes4u.com at http://www.desitunes4u.com/Djinn4.jpg - also, see User_talk:Emix#Image_copyright_problem_with_:Image:PIC00103.jpg - same? Chzz ► 05:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PIC00144449.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very poor quality image of a common object (a donkey). Sven Manguard Wha? 05:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's an African Wild Ass. postdlf (talk) 21:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PIC00203 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted per CSD F1. — Edokter (talk) — 13:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Smaller version of File:PIC00203.JPG. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HarveyKaye.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused portrait photograph, never been in use in the article it was intended for. Uploader has removed self-cc-by tag, with the somewhat unclear reason "since CC-BY-SA is not licensed to use this image". This seems to indicate not so much an attempt at revoking a valid license (which would be irrelevant for us) but an admission that the licensing was erroneous from the start, i.e. likely copyvio. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's marked as a self-created image: there's no good evidence that this is not an own work. Blanking a file description page with such an explanation is a common way to attempt to revoke licensing, but it's nowhere near a common way to say that you uploaded a copyvio. What an odd coincidence that the nominator discovered this situation and attempted to get the image deleted just half an hour after I declined it, just like many other images whose deletions I decline. Nyttend (talk) 11:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedied; it was in fact from the subject's (not the uploader's) Facebook profile. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Commonsd as Mitsubishi Freight Elevator buttons.jpg - Peripitus (Talk) 00:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality image of a common object. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Commons. Certainly usable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0002 001 0001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image of an unidentified minor. Not used. Not encyclopedic. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:42, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0007 3 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of a long retired user. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0019.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Originally a team photo for a junior soccer team, the image page was co-opted for an image of a grave, then at tree, then the grave again. There is no description of what the grave is, and no notability for the original soccer team. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT00292.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: On Commons as File:9 month old dog.jpg - Peripitus (Talk) 00:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality image of an unidentified dog. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is not low quality! And it shouldn't be difficult to identify the breed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's very sun-bleached and sorta blurry. To me that's low quality. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0031.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very low quality image of a generic object/activity. Used in an incomplete article by a user that has been gone for several years, but otherwise unused. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0033.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - I am reading the below argument that, on balance, the image is free. It is currently used and, if required, skilled image editors can fairly invisibly remove the watermark - Peripitus (Talk) 01:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very intrusive watermark with copyright information that contradicts the release. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:55, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is currently in use, so copyvio is the only way it can be deleted. It is quite clear that the uploader is indeed the photographer and copyright holder. So the question is: Does the watermark invalidate the free license? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That was my thesis. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - If we are certain the photographer and the uploader are the same person, I don't see it as a problem. An "all rights reserved" sign next to a free license sign is just like a duplicate license (e.g. GFDL + CC-BY): you can pick and choose. Which means we'd even be entitled to make a derivative version removing the copyright mark. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Of that we are certain, as the Blogspot and Wikipedia usernames match. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:43, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I would say an "All Rights Reserved" next to a "Some Rights Reserved" is an incompatible releasing. And the blog spam is annoying. --Damiens.rf 15:33, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Not vastly more incompatible than a CC-BY-SA tag (i.e. some rights reserved) next to a GFDL tag (i.e. some other rights reserved). Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Those usually (but should be always) come with an explicit you can choose the one of your choice statement. But by the way, why don't we just crop the image? --Damiens.rf 16:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Well the template takes up about a tenth of the image itself. Cropping it would take out the bottom quarter in its entirety. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0054half.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Band photo of non notable band (without an article), possibly copyrighted. Orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0061134.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image, subject is unidentifiable. Therefore the file is unusable. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0067.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and unencyclopedic. This upload and an edit to the page are the only contributions of the uploader, so NOTFLICKR applies. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0077a.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and unencylopedic. Upload is only contribution of uploader, so NOTFLICKR applies. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0095.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Smaller version of File:PICT0094.jpg. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0094.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Unused user photo for user who has not edited since 2007. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0119.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unencyclopedic. Upload is user's only contribution, so NOTFLICKR applies. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0128.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete close. James F. (talk) 23:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photo of a minor. Unusable elsewhere. Editor has not edited since 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia Logo Blue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - any other result would mean too much of someone's life spent in AWB, bot programming or many redlinks - Peripitus (Talk) 01:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia logo image for which a Vectorised version exists. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is used on about 400 talk pages and the SVG version linked isn't an exact copy by any means. That said, I don't really care what happens to the image but I just thought I'd mentioned these points. FF20 1 0 21:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is heavily used. Deleting it doesn't save any server space and won't do much good, so it's more trouble than it's worth. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Prodigy - Expanded.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image with (a) no rationale and (b) so little difference to the existing one that a bit of text can describe the differences so (c) it fails your pick of Non-free content requirements#1, 3a and 8. Perhaps the image is PD-text but I'm chosing not to draw the line here Peripitus (Talk) 11:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:All You Zombies Single.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is so similar to the existing one in the article it could be adequately replaced by text describing the visual effect change. Image fails WP:NFCC#1. I note also that the rationale is the usual template and saying that this is the "primary image" is just plain wrong. Peripitus (Talk) 11:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MMFTJG The Prodigy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image that is, except for "rotation of the face clockwise by about 45deg and the addition of the word more" is identical to the existing one. The differences can be covered with text alone and this one fails WP:NFCC#1, 8 and 3a. Rationale is innappropriate for this image as it states, as part of the justification, that this is the "primary image" of the album Peripitus (Talk) 11:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jake Jeckel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is largely identical to another in the article. The changes (reversed, happy→unhappy, some colours swapped) can easily be described with text alone. Image is not needed to significantly increase reader's understanding. Image fails NFCC#1, 3a and 8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Startsomethingusa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image that is close to identical to another in the article. Trivial differences can be described with text alone. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 (replaceable with text), WP:NFCC#8 (removal would not signficantly harm reader's understanding, WP:NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free images). at least for once the rationale does state that it is the second cover rather than the primary image. Peripitus (Talk) 11:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ben Folds Five - Whatever and Ever Amen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image that is just the "remastered edition" image with one phot removed and the text moved. Small changes can be described with text alone. image fails WP:NFCC#1, 8 and 3a Peripitus (Talk) 11:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If any image is to be used in the article it should be the original cover. DCEdwards ¹⁹⁶⁶ 18:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Morrissey-Bona Drag Reissue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image that is just a colour-changed and text-moved version of the existing one in the article. Changes can be adequately conveyed with text alone and this image fails WP:NFCC#1, 3a and 8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dddwill.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is very similar to the existing one in the article. Differences can be adequately conveyed with text alone and this image fails WP:NFCC#1, 3a and 8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmithsHatful.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is basically just a crop of the existing image. The Changes can be adequately conveyed with text alone and this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 11:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:8586orange.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is just a differently coloured version of the existing image. The Changes can be adequately conveyed with text alone,and indeed are in the article, and this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 11:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SoftBulletinSurroundCoverArt.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is mostly a cropped version with some text changes of the existing image. The Changes can be adequately conveyed with text alone, and this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 11:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FatboySlimBetterLivingThroughChemistry.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is just a differently coloured version of the existing image. The Changes (orange border) can be adequately conveyed with text alone,and indeed are in the article, and this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 11:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GIANTPINGAS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is just a modified version of the existing image. The Changes (text resized and recoloured) can be adequately conveyed with text alone,and indeed are in the article, and this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 11:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Byosplit3-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is just a modified version of the existing image. The Changes (changed from green to orange) can be adequately conveyed with text alone and this image fails WP:NFCC#1, 8 and 3a Peripitus (Talk) 11:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PanelMetz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept with the new attribution - licences and sources are recorded in the image page for all 4 components now - Peripitus (Talk) 01:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Panel of four photographs, claimed "own work", likely copyvio. Two of the components were identified as images from Commons, used without correct attribution. While the problem with respect to these two images can be remedied through correct attribution, we must assume that the other two are not own work either. Image was tagged as "no source" but untagged by an administrator who refuses to understand that an "own work" claim that has already been proven to be false isn't worth anything. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added more information about my uploaded file on its edit page. Sorry for the mistake, but I didn't know how to characterized the collage, as there is 2 own works and 2 wiki files. Then, I did the collage and claimed "own work" without any other information. I hope that now it should be ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bava Alcide57 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0162.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, no description for current image. Image in history doesn't have a clear encyclopedic use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Javedbinyousaf.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR; uploader blocked for spamming. Looks like this would have been used in an article which they created (which is now deleted). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LG Rumor 2 front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HTC Sensation.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apple iPhone 3GS front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apple iPhone 4 front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I can do that. The exterior design is ineligible as a useful article, but do you think the showing the home screen buttons is sufficiently DM? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not understand what you ask. --Damiens.rf 10:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I can take a picture of an iPhone if desired, but should I show the phone on or off? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Either off, or perhaps with something other than the copyrighted OS screen on the display. Perhaps just some free photograph (that would still give something of an impression of the graphic capabilities of the display)? Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:19, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Load Wikipedia on the browser. This very page if you can. Hello, mama! --Damiens.rf 23:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apple iPhone 3G front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T-Mobile USA myTouch 4G smartphone.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LG GT540 Optimus front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LG Optimus 2X front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Google Nexus S front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Google HTC Nexus One front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Motorola Droid X front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LG Optimus One P500 front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 14:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tchaikovsky theatre 3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are free images of this place and new ones could be created. Damiens.rf 14:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Janusz Kaluski & David Beech.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - does not pass both WP:NFCC#1 and 8 - Peripitus (Talk) 10:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free picture of a man posing for a photo. Damiens.rf 14:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is in use at the article Janusz Kaluski where its context is explained. It is the only older photograph we have of this individual and is relevant to the article as it depicts Kaluski presenting his collection to the British Library. Image also shows the actual collection. Image has been reduced in size. No free image of this event is available. The image should be retained. Philafrenzy (talk) 15:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you believe the image, at least as it's currently used, satisfies WP:NFCC#8? --Damiens.rf 15:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just read those guidelines and as far as I can see it satisfied them all. (It may not be relevant but the British Library intended this image for exactly this sort of use, that was why they released it.) Philafrenzy (talk) 22:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just a picture of two people holding something illegible with stacks in the background. I fail to see how this gives the reader any more useful information than is conveyed by the text. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a biographical article and the picture shows the subject in later life. It is the only known photograph of him in later life and depicts a key event in his life when he donated his collection of 50 years to the British Library. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete either this or the other (younger) portrait. We don't need two non-free images of the same guy showing him at two different points in time, merely to show how he has aged (we all do). We also don't need to see a photograph of this particular scene to understand he donated his collection to the library. One image may be acceptable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Memphis Motorsports Park Aerial Shot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We should illustrate this park with free images and not with images from google maps. Damiens.rf 14:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Azem hajdari pas vrasjes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: orphaned and would have been deleted even if it wasn't been (NFCC #1, #8). Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of an assassination victim. Fails NFCC#8: we don't need to see his gunshot wounds in order to understand he was shot. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it fails NFCC8 and the copyright belongs to Gazeta Shqiptare.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 09:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it is not upload to show he was killed. It was uploaded in what a brutal way he is killed in order to show why democrats got so angry. It is also their to show clear the wounds of him. --Vinie007 18:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, a picture is worth a thousand words. This photo conveys information about the brutality in a way that can't quite be replicated with text. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the image fairly clearly shows a man who has been shot. Beyond that I don't get much from it. I'm sure it has emotional content for some, but to me it looks little different from images of others who have been shot. The text is sufficient, for me, to convey what happened adequately - Peripitus (Talk) 09:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"A picture is worth a thousand words", on Wikipedia, is the perennial mantra of the intellectually lazy, and of the POV pusher. If you want to get the message across that this shooting was done in a particularly brutal way, you could do so just fine not in a thousand and not in a hundred words; twenty would be more than sufficient. But those twenty words would say not less, but a lot more than the image does: they would cry out "POV! OR!", loud and clear, and that's something you don't want to hear. If making the message explicit in words would be an act of tendentious OR, why do you expect that to try and get it across covertly through the emotional appeal of an image would be a legitimate motive for using one? Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment i think in this case we need to keep it. I can't belive that your 20 words these is beter than my picture. Please scroll up watch 5 seconds to the infobox picture and than scroll down to my upload file. It just impressive the first anti communist Albanian leader is killed in such manner --Vinie007 21:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Did you just falsify my vote, by changing my "delete" into a "comment" [2]? How dare you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, since you nominated this, your deletion vote was implied. That being said, Vinie007 that's bad form. Any more of that could result in a block. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:12, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ouch, sorry, I honestly forgot I was the nominator. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - - OR is precisely the reason we need this image, which shows reality as it is. If you claim this image is OR, then can you produce an image (whether free or non-free, doesn't matter for OR purposes) that shows how non-brutal the killing is? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - all relevant information this image may contain (relevant to the article) can be expressed with words backed up by reliable sources. (and this is not asking for the article to describe the image). --Damiens.rf 23:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, this is the most brutal killing in the Albanian history. This couldn't be discribed with "just" words. I think that in this case an exeption is te right choise. --Vinie007 20:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's useful for the history of the two parties.--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SamsungTransform.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 19:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment wouldn't any photo be copyrighted, because the device's software itself is copyrighted? 65.95.13.213 (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There are two components here, the software and the hardware. Items of hardware are protected as works of industrial design, which is also a form of intellectual property protection, but legally different from actual copyright. They are protected only against actual product piracy (i.e. copying the design to make actual replica products), not against making mere photographs of them. It is different with the software display, because screenshots of software can actually be copyrighted. However, discussing and showing the software is typically not necessary for an article about a modern smartphone model, because the hardware and the software are technically independent of each other, and the software operating systems typically have their own articles. The OS article can have a non-free image of a screenshot; the hardware article can have a free image of the phone with a blank screen. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - ...or maybe running a free software, or displaying a freely licensed image or text...--Damiens.rf 16:50, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; clearly replaceable. Incidentally, I don't think the display of the software in this image is copyrightable, as it just consists of alternating gray and black bands (ok, maybe the thumbnail of the user's face is, but that's not the software itself). Just because software is copyrighted doesn't mean that a screenshot of it necessarily is unless there's something graphically unique about it. postdlf (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BlackBerryBold9650.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 19:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HTC Inspire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free image of an object available at stores. Fails NFCC#1 in that a free alternative could be created. That is, someone could take a picture of one of those and release it under a free license. Damiens.rf 19:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment wouldn't any photo of the phone be copyrighted, because the OS desktop is copyrighted? 65.95.13.213 (talk) 05:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SanDiegoProposedUSFederalCourthouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - Peripitus (Talk) 10:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of an upcoming building being used as a thumbnail decorating a brief listing of the building in a list article. Damiens.rf 19:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The building is currently under construction, so I'd recommend leaving this up for another week or two. I'll go downtown and get a picture of the building's current construction status. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samsung E1170.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have this phone and will upload a free picture soon. Damiens.rf 19:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment would that be a free photo? Isn't the look of the phone trademarked or otherwise protected? 65.95.13.213 (talk) 05:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Useful objects without a particularly artistic design are ineligible for copyright protection. They can be patented, however, but that is not important to us. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Somali Military.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted, NFCC #8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free historical photograph, showing a generic scene of soldiers marching, used in three articles. FUR makes the astonishing claim it is "a one-of-a-kind training march". I always thought training marches were a rather regular occurrence in most armies. Not the object of commentary in any of the three articles. Purely decorative, fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Image is indeed of a unique historical troop formation march of the Somali National Army (SNA) prior to its disbandment in the early 1990s during the Somali Civil War. At the time, the SNA was among the largest armies on the continent. No free alternatives are available. Middayexpress (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the image has no source, shows something rather generic and does not significantly add to reader's understanding - Peripitus (Talk) 22:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a clear violation of WP:NFCC#8, since it's not clear how the lack of the visual information contained in the image could possible be detrimental to the article. Also, answers.com is not a valid source for this image.--Damiens.rf 00:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Shows no distinguishing features of the Somali military, and therefore does not aid the reader's understanding of the topic. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Album Crunk Juice Chopped & Screwed cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( very little ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly, and NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horses in the Sky vinyl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( bird changed a bit, background colour changed a bit) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly, and NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Songs of Distant Earth CD-Rom Content - Oldfield.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

purely decorative non-free image. Adds nothing of significance to reader's understanding of the topic. Rationale makes no effort to explain why we need this ("To identify computer content" is a very poor effort) Peripitus (Talk) 22:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is an example of an early Enhanced CD from 1994, as Enhanced CDs did not become popular until the late 1990s. reference TubularWorld (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we need an image off the CD ? Text alone can state it is an enhanced CD. What significant additional understanding of the topic does this image bring ? - Peripitus (Talk) 01:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LLegend.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( very little ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly, and NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bowie BlueJean BlueVinyl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn - image is free nowPeripitus (Talk) 21:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image of a physical object. Clearly replaceable with free content (fails WP:NFCC#1. Peripitus (Talk) 22:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious how this is a non-free image that's replaceable with a free one? This is a scan of a copy in my collection btw. Looking for a way to make sure this meets WP's guidelines. 87Fan (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is an image of the real LP necessary? All the "art" seems really generic. --Damiens.rf 17:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fair question, but I thought at issue was whether or not this was a free image (which I believe it is). It's not my intention to be combatative, just trying to figure out what the issue is and how to fix it. I don't believe the image has to be removed. 87Fan (talk) 17:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's non-free because you did not release the image you created under a free licence. If you are happy to release this image under a free licence then I don't see a problem. The item itself seems to lack the creativity to apply additional restrictions. Which free licence do you want ? - Peripitus (Talk) 09:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably an early image I uploaded before I knew all the right boxes to tick when I submitted photos. I admit I'm at a loss as to what options are appropriate for this image so it can meet the 'free' standard. Anyone have a suggestion? 87Fan (talk) 21:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is change the fair-use tag to GFDL-self, CC-self, PD-self, or a combination of the first two. Also, you can upload a high-resolution version of it if you still have it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for the information. I think PD-self is the best license for this file. I will mark it as such. Let me know if this does not resolve this issue. 87Fan (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0245.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, orphaned image of an unidentified person, possibly a minor. No encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0255.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Image has extensive description of something that cannot actually be seen in the image. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. To their credit they're pretty clear there's a building on the sinkhole, so obviously you can't take a picture of the sinkhole itself. But it appears to be non-notable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shihad-thegeneralelectricbonus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( background changed to white, sticker added) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly, and NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0374-amigos.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very low quality image, unidentified subject. Orpahned. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Janet jackson design of a decade metal case.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a physical object. Fails to add significantly to reader's understanding of the article's topic. As well I can't see why we are hosting a non-free image of a physical object. If needed someone can take a photo of it, perhaps open even so reader's can see aspects of its design or operation Peripitus (Talk) 22:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slayer - Soundtrack to the Apocalypse (side).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image of the side of a box. I cannot see what this adds at all to the article. Fails NFCC#8 - does not add significantly to reader's understanding. Peripitus (Talk) 22:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ommadawn 2010.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( less washed out, deluxe edition overlay added) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly, and NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Fading - Chaos in Flesh EP 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence it is freely released, unused. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:After bathing at baxters.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep but alternative deleted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( top and bottom border added ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly, and NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but delete File:JA After-Bathing-At-Baxters UK-1968.jpg instead. Since this is a US band, I think the US cover should take precedence. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MCMXC a.D. - The Limited Edition Album.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( very little ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly, and NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nevermore enemiesre.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( colour changed ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly. Peripitus (Talk) 22:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0411.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality depreciated image. Orphaned. Originally for the article on Fauxhawk, which was merged into Mohawk, which already has plenty of better images. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0427.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Upload is user's only contribution, so NOTFLICKR applies. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0430.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality. Upload is user's only contribution, so NOTFLICKR applies. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0509.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted - if anyone who is not an admin wants to move it to Commons and would like for it to be restored temporarily for that purpose, please ask at WP:REFUND, but I see no reason to leave this IFD opened perpetually just in case someone wants to copy it to Commons. --B (talk) 03:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image that does not really depict the area it says it does. Orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename. I really don't think our standards for keeping images is that high. Why, in 2004 this was a featured picture! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The larger issue at play is that this is supposedly an image of a town. I see a car lot with a house in the background. Those are two very different things; one has a constructive use in an article, the other less so. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't see any immediate use on Wikipedia, but it certainly looks plausible, so I think moving to Commons would be the best option. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:37, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stillcoolalbum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, largely redundant to the in-use File:Stillcoolalternatecover.jpg. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ushanka001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality image. We already have plenty of nice pictures for the Ushanka article, so this wouldn't really add anything. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vallalarpic3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in uploader's userspace. More likely to be legitimately free than the above two, but since it is by the same uploader and used in the same way I think it is safe to assume that it was also copied from somewhere. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dangit, meant to check the PUF box in Twinkle. Ah well; I'll just leave it here now. Basically, the other two images really look like they're non-free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No description, no source, no date, no author. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0552.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G10 by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image has deliberate vandalism which makes it unusable (see editing of person third to the right). Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.