Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starship Highlander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nothing sourced to merge. czar 04:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Starship Highlander

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable films, tagged for 2 years. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable fan films. There are no sources in English that I can find. Searching for sources under its original German name turns up a couple of hits, but nothing substantial - a couple of mentions in the comments sections of some articles on Star Trek, and a university student's paper that mentions it as an example of Star Trek fan fiction. The German Wikipedia has a longer article on the series, but the length is merely due to a lot of plot information, and the entire thing is sourced only to the series' creator's own website. Rorshacma (talk) 21:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Star Trek fan productions --~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-chan^nyan 17:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Star Trek fan productions as a valid alternative to deletion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Star Trek fan productions I'm a big star trek fan, and I've not even heard of this! Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Everyone is stating it should be merged, but is this a notable enough fan series that it even warrants a mention at Star Trek fan productions? As I mentioned in my comment above, there are zero sources in the English article, and only the creator's website as a source in the German article. Without any sourced content here, what exactly would we be merging? Rorshacma (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (1) This in fact isn't a star trek fan production, its a fan made science fiction production that parodies science fiction generally (2) As for the rest of the article - there's basically no referencing for anything here - The two external references for it don't work, one link is to the official website, which is down, and the other link is to what it claims is an IMDB page for the movie, but its actually for a different star trek production. Deathlibrarian (talk) 14:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, however if we choose WP:ATD-M we can merge this fan made production or redirect it to Star Trek fan productions Wm335td (talk) 19:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not seem to even have significant enough coverage for a list mention, patently non-notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.