Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most likely an auto-biography and very resume like. Borderline for CSD G11 but I will take to AfD. Individual likely fails WP:NACADEMIC at this time. Safiel (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from the person who filed two CSDs: I've filed two CSDs and he has removed them. I did not use A or G, I used a custom db reason since it is more to be reasonable. *Xyaena~* (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I declined speedy deletion as the reason given was not valid and I didn't see any valid speedy deletion reasons. The article has not ever been deleted through the Articles for Deletion process, so CSD G4 is not applicable. Article was deleted via CSD A7 on one occasion, but a deletion under CSD A7 does not preclude recreation. The only speedy deletion that remotely applies is CSD G11, blatant spam. While the article does appear promotional, it does not appear to be blatant enough to invoke CSD G11. The best route in this case for seeking deletion is via the Articles for Deletion process, which I have initiated. Safiel (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A BLP of a scientist like this stands or falls on the basis of citation record in GS. In this case it falls. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. He was blocked for these kinds of articles. Delete is the best option. *Xyaena~* (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.