Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Hilter and the Minehead by-election
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PeaceNT 11:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mr. Hilter and the Minehead by-election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete - prod disputed on the basis of the "iconic status" of Monty Python. I certainly do not dispute that Monty Python is highly notable but since notability is not inherited it does not follow that every single sketch from every single episode also is. This individual sketch is not notable on its own and the article is also a clear violation of WP:PLOT as it is nothing but a description/plot summary. Otto4711 17:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This nomination is concurrent with the nomination of four other Monty Python-related articles:
- I shall voice my opinion on the nomination later, suffice now to mention it was I who removed the prod. __meco 20:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a notable skit, couldn't find reliable sources to establish notability. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 20:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete George Carlin once observed that there's nothing more boring than hearing someone else describe a dream they had last night. But George hadn't read THIS article. Mandsford 22:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Fails to establish sufficient notability. Zouavman Le Zouave 23:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.