Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milena Roucka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - sockpuppetry is futile.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Milena Roucka

Because WP is not a crystal ball 1 and just because one is signed to a WWE developmental territory does not mean they are instantly notable or that they would appear on WWE programming beyond diva search. Renosecond 23:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the sooner the better. --Yamla 00:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep I can't believe how many WWE Diva Search-related attempted deletions I've stumbled into over the past couple days. Allow me to use some precedent: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Weber This discussion was just resolved a day ago in favor of keep. I think we've pretty well established that people who are featured as contestants on the Diva Search are notable, particularly in a case like this where they had been featured on television for weeks and weeks. -Umdunno 00:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Amy Weber is much more notable at this moment than the one I just flagged for deletion. This person has been on WWE TV, usually in a brief, non-speaking role, as a CONTESTANT for maybe 3 or 4 weeks. Webber was probably notable enough anyway due to her role on Son of the Beach, even before the diva search. That is a horrible, piss-poor precedent, not even a shade comparable to this. I think my "crystal ball" agrument is far stronger than yours. Renosecond 03:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I'm going to apologize for claiming the Diva Search precedent, as I hadn't realized yet so many were up for deletion (as you well know) though I don't think it would make a "piss-poor" precedent. Anyway, let's see where all these articles end up.-Umdunno 03:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh, and I added a comment to your talk page about the current discussion about this whole Diva Search situation in the relevant Wikiproject. -Umdunno 03:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep per Umdunno. TJ Spyke 00:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as with other reality show contestants, unless there is some other documentation of notability, there does not need to be a separate article. -- Whpq 16:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "just because one is signed to a WWE developmental territory does not mean they are instantly notable or that they would appear on WWE programming" This could be said of nearly anyone currently in a developmental territory, and if that is the precident by which deletions will be made, many more would have to occur beyond this one article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.106.90 (talk • contribs)
Strong Keep She'e more than a reality show contestant. From what I looked up, she's been on WWE television for more than the past month and she was recently contracted to the WWE following the contest. She's a model and actress so I think since she's contracted to WWE, there's probably going to be more updates on her new job in the near future. I think it's safe to say that she meets WP:N. — The Future 23:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please I have needed lots of info on her lately, and this has been the best place to find it. All of the Diva Search contestants should be kept on Wikipedia at least until the next Diva Search takes place. If the contestants aren't in the WWE by that time, it is safe to delete her article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.20.180.64 (talk • contribs)
Undelete Although Milena did not win the Diva Search contest, she just signed a contract with WWE. She is going to be a WWE diva and she may debut very shortly. Don't delete because when she debuts, she's having storylines and all becomes part of her history. I AM LOVE 01:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC) [reply]

I think you mean Keep, it wasn't deleted yet, so undelete doesn't make sense :) — The Future 02:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please discount the above vote from an abusive sockpuppet which has been permanently banned. --Yamla 02:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Perhaps further down the line, but it's WAY too early to say that she's notable enough for an entry. Deputy Marshall 01:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm hoping that more users who aren't fanbois will talk on this discussion, but here are some other Diva Search contestants who have recently been deleted: 1, 2, 3, 4 and several speedied ones. Renosecond 02:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Since when has simply being a contestant in a contest been notable? --Dennette 00:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reno, none of those contestants got contracts. Milena has recieved a WWE contract, which helps her notability. TJ Spyke 19:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it helps a tiny bit, but being signed to a contract means that there is no gaurantee that she will have any role in future WWE programming, even being in the development territories does not promise instant notability. Look at the deletion review for Amy Zidian [1], she is in the same exact boat as this, and it will probably not pass. Getting signed to a contract does not mean anything at this point, let's wait and see, WP is not a cyrstal ball. Renosecond 02:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.