Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JangleBox
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SoWhy 14:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JangleBox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Has an advert tag on it for 6 years and an unreferenced tag for 12 years. » Shadowowl | talk 23:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. See Summer NAMM 2016: Editors' Picks – Day 1 from Premier Guitar. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:22, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, the Premier Guitar reference is a short paragraph and not really indicative of any long-standing notability. Ifnord (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Search finds no significant independent coverage, only passing mentions, routine coverage, and PR placement. Product and company both fail WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Bakazaka (talk) 21:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not finding any evidence of notability, and reads a bit too like promotion to me.Slatersteven (talk) 10:47, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The Summer NAMM 2016 source added recently is just a minor mention that does very little to satisfy WP:NCORP. The vast majority of the article remains unsourced WP:OR. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.