Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot100Brasil
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was - as per unanimous vote it is delete --JForget 23:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hot100Brasil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
These charts show up on countless album and song pages, yet it is completely unofficial and is created by some anonymous person. The article is unreferenced and does not assert notability as far as I can see. Article itself states, "It is important to know that it is an amateur site, unofficial and according to most chart experts, not realistic at all. The charts are compiled and published weekly by an unknown amateur." Huh? How would this be more notable than any other music fan's personal chart thrown onto a website? Thoughts/opinions? - eo (talk) 02:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also nominating
- List of year-end number-one hits (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of number-one hits of 2001 (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of number-one hits of 2002 (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of number-one hits of 2003 (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of number-one hits of 2004 (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of number-one hits of 2005 (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of number-one hits of 2007 (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of number-one hits of 2008 (Brazil) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delete delete as spam. We are not their database. If they want to store their data, they should pay a server. Billboard charts are way more important, and don't store their data in here. Also, no independent second sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tosqueira (talk • contribs) 00:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clear spam and using wikipedia as their website --Nice poa (talk) 04:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly someone using Wikipedia as their free web server. Not notable, and admits to not being official Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Blatant spam for a non-notablec chart published by an indie source. And can someone please help remove all the chart positions from the song pages? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment : The Hot100Brasil page was created by InternationalHit2. The version as of March 3, 2007 said : "The official Brazilian music charts are currently compiled by Hot100Brasil on behalf of the Brazilian record industry and are published weekly." Apparently, the page has been vandalized several times by anonymous users who absolutely wanted to say that this chart was not official and not realistic. Who is right ? Europe22 (talk) 00:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The pt-version started 12 days later, at March 15, 2007: Same text (obviously a translation)...--Gunnex (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: Deleted (pt-Afd).--Gunnex (talk) 19:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete lists of this type have been repeatedly deleted for violating WP:NOT and WP:COPY. True or not, these should all go. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.