Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granville Automatic

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 November 7.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guideline at this time. Davewild (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Granville Automatic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources. ^Bongo_matic 03:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - they don't appear to meet any of the criteria in WP:BAND except for the notability of their members (criterion 6), one of which was in a notable band and the other won the John Lennon Songwriting Contest. The latter claim needs a citation. Hell, the whole thing needs citations, but it may be notable. §everal⇒|Times 18:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. They get a few listings and brief mentions for their shows. Nothing in Amazon or last.fm, so I'm guessing that their one finished album is sold only at their shows. Third-place in one category in a minor music award. Have some Youtube videos, none quite managing 1,000 views. Could become notable group, but not there now. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Seem to be sligtly notable and could become more notable. Needs references etc. Dontforgetthisone (talk) 23:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.