Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill House Home
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. czar 22:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hill House Home (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Any significance seems to centre around a single garment that was popular during the Covid pandemic. Searches reveal very little of worth about the article subject, but more about the garment. Sources are very weak. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 21:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Easily meets notability guidelines. Widespread coverage for years in major news sources. Hard to understand the deletion rationale. Did the nominator make an effort to find sources before nominating? Thriley (talk) 22:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: A quick Google search in the news sections shows a decent amount of coverage about the dress the business made, but not really the business itself. My recommended action would be to assess the nap dress's notability first, since that's what this article seems to hinge on for its validation of existence. If the dress can be deemed notable enough, then it could be included in a relevant section of, I dunno... 2020s in fashion? If the dress isn't notable, then the article about the business itself doesn't really have a leg to stand on. Sirocco745 (talk) 03:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Can you explain more on your claim that the fashion store/brand is lacking in notability? While there is certainly a ton of news coverage of their Nap Dress product that made them big in 2020, there also continues to be significant coverage of them since, with that coverage focusing on what the company has expanded into beyond just that product, including plenty of news covering their physical expansion over the years as well. Some examples:
- Hill House Home Opens New South Carolina Store Featuring Fashion, Homewares & Snacks - Women's Wear Daily
- Hill House Is Bringing Its Nap Dress Magic to Wallpapers and Pillows - Architectural Digest
- The Nap Room: How Hill House Home Redefined the Drop and Created Entrepreneurial Magic - Inc.
- Hill House raises $20 million to build on Nap Dress success and expand fashion portfolio - Fortune
- I'm seeing extended and ongoing coverage showcasing their notability as a store, fairly consistently having articles about them in both major newspapers and fashion and business magazines. If anything, the coverage has been increasing in the past two years as compared to earlier. SilverserenC 04:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep With recent coverage in Fast Company, Forbes, and other business publications, it seems to have continuing notability, being more than just a flash in the pan. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.