Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Modular Data Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google Modular Data Center

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been pointed out as a possible hoax filled with misinformation. You can see the talk page. I couldn't find reliable coverage of the actual subject of the article without the ones copied from this article in mirror sites. The article's sources showcase that Google has a patent, but there's no proof or coverage where it establishes that it got developed. X (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - appears to be repeating a rumour and consequently there is a danger of spreading misinformation. Even if there was better sourcing, I doubt specific data center could really be considered to be eternally notable. JMWt (talk) 13:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Found this. I don't comment further. --Ouro (blah blah) 14:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax or not, all I found was this, so this fails both WP:GNG and WP:SUSTAINED. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.