Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronographos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The WordsmithTalk to me 23:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chronographos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find reliable sources to prove its notability. It has been in CAT:UNREF for more than 16 years. Boleyn (talk) 16:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No demonstration of notability beyond WP:PASSING mentions. I've been following this discussion for a while, and did some searching myself for RS, and came up with essentially nothing. HappyWith (talk) 05:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.