User talk:Tangerines

	Archives
	1st 2nd 3rd 4th; 5th 6th 7th 8th ; 9th

Please start a new section at the bottom of the page for new topics and sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~). Thank you.

Ian Evatt

You might want to check this season's stats line. I think it should be two league goals, and he can't have scored in the FA Cup. - Dudesleeper / Talk 19:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bloomers

Oops, I forgot to get back to you on the capacity. Sorry about that. - Dudesleeper / Talk 14:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism?

Have a look at this. Surely they didn't just print Wikipedia articles and release it as their own work? - Dudesleeper / Talk 13:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Cross

Yes, please pass along Cross's contact details when you get a chance. Thanks. - Dudesleeper / Talk 00:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

this is the guy from the Ian Stuart disscussion. How are you going to delete my posts but not the man's post, where he wrote that Ian Stuart was an asshole? Degrogatory/Innappropriate?

Thornton

Is the Cala Gran even in Thornton? I thought it was over the Cod Head line... - Dudesleeper / Talk 14:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Euell

Are you sure he's captain? He hasn't started a game for a while... - Dudesleeper talk 12:43, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Crainey

I have attempted to delete a part of this page, which you apparantly object to. If you can give me a reason why unsubsttantiated newspaper speculation is considered notable enough to be included I will stop - as has been said before, newspapers carry stories about transfer rumours every day, most of which, like this piece of history, come to nothing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.107.64 (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Images in your User Space

Hey there Tangerines, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Tangerines/sandbox4. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jason Euell

Makes sense. I'm not a fan of denoting the vice-captain, but club captain and team captain, yes. - Dudesleeper talk 13:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool books

Gerry Wolstenholme tells me he's in the midst of writing two books on the club. He says he's doing them in a hurry. I think one of them will be a reissuing of the player grids in Roy Calley's books, because he's irked at how incorrect they are. Not sure on the other one. - Dudesleeper talk 01:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rotherham united & the chuckle brothers

Hi tangerine: I am hoping to draw your attention to the Rotherham united page. A section has been added again on the chuckle brothers - I see that this is something you have lambasted in the past. Would you be able to review and add your comment? Thanks. 79.72.185.231 (talk) 22:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bloomers

Just wondering if you know the new capacity of the ground now that the South Stand is functional. - Dudesleeper talk 21:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2007–08 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy

I have nominated 2007–08 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bettia (talk) 10:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2008–09 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy has also been listed as part of this AfD. Bettia (talk) 10:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Knock, knock

Everything alright over there? You haven't been on much, which is odd considering the recent adventures of our fine footie club. - Dudesleeper talk 00:07, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool F.C. season 2009-10

It seems Soccerbase is off on a few League appearances for some players. Southern, for example, is shown as making 45 appaearances, whereas the club's official website has him down as 46 (2). It doesn't state whether the two sub appearances are inclusive, which means that they too could have it wrong. We need a definitive source. - Dudesleeper talk 11:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool F.C Squad Numbers

I know but I think it is better to have last years squad numbers rather than none at all until the new ones are released. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.99.118 (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Halstead

As he has played (Sky Sports reported at 3 mins after kick off: "Direct free kick taken right-footed by Mark Halstead (Blackpool) from own half, resulting in open play.") I have restored the article, and added a brief mention about this first game. If you can find a reliable source which mentions it (you'll probably need to find it after the game is completed), then that can be added to verify the information -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and don't worry I update all the Blackpool players anyway after each game so I know what to do and to do it after the game! Thanks for your help!--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually added both the reference, and a link to BBC Sport's player profile for him! It's over to you now (I'm not a great footy fan!) -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ishita Bhaduri for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ishita Bhaduri, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishita Bhaduri until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 01:06, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Tibetan naming conventions

A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 16:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Active Resistance to Metrication

An article that you have been involved in editing, Active Resistance to Metrication, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Hoary (talk) 01:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Urban Regeneration Companies

Hi Tangerines. I've just added a colon in front of Category:Urban Regeneration Companies so that your To Do page doesn't appear in the category page. Hope that's OK. --Northernhenge (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Dodd

Hello there, I've reverted your recent changes to the above article. If you wish to discuss then feel free to send me a message on the matter. Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Basically why I was opposed to your edits are as followed:

(1) You replaced the Soccerway reference with a Soccerbase reference (when the latter doesn't include his Altrincham stats) so therefore it doesn't full reference the stats table. Note Soccerbase was already included in external links.
(2) You removed Blackpool his parent club from the stats table, they should be included despite the fact he hasn't played a game for them. More importantly the infobox only displays league matches, by including Blackpool in the stats table it makes it clearer to readers that he hasn't made a cup appearance for them.
(3) The template which was added doesn't include an other column, therefore having to included other fixtures in Total which makes the table look at a glance mathematically inaccurate (I'm well aware of the fact that a footnote could added explaining). But I feel this table has more downsides then benefits.

No problem, I'm not bothered either way to be honest. Have fun!--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 12:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'Chris Holland'

Hi. The article 'Chris Holland' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://s252742243.websitehome.co.uk/News/Archive/November2008//012.php

You added this in November 2008.
The bot tested this link on 29 March, 31 March, 2 April and today, but it never worked.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ángel Martínez - Reply

Hi there TANGERINES, VASCO here,

sorry for any incovenience due to my edit on this guy's page. I did not notice i reverted good English and turned it into "bad", my sincere apologies, already reinstated your additions per what you mention in my page. However, just one small request: no need to be referring all the time to SEGUNDA DIVISION (the link/word already appears once in storyline, when mentioning his collapsed move), writing "second level" or "second division" or "another team in the category/level" suffices please.

Attentivelly, keep up the good work, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Animal rights

You are receiving this semi-automated message because you are a participant of WikiProject Animal rights. If the project is not on your watchlist or you have not visited the WikiProject recently you will not be aware of some of the changes that I have made to the pages, or aware of an a issue that has been raised about my attempt to re-categorise some of the project related articles. Please revisit the project talk page to add your input. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stunt show listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stunt show. Since you had some involvement with the Stunt show redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Themeparkgc Talk 00:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tiago Gomes

A newish user is persistant in putting Tiago's number as 8 yet there is no official confirmation of it as yet. Can you go to their talk page and reiterate my point of waiting till the official site has confirmed it please, he doesn't appear to want to listen to me. Seasider91 (talk) 23:14, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Farzan Athari, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iranian and Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yid Army for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yid Army is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yid Army until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrStoofer (talk • contribs) 15:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Noguera

Hi there TANGERINES, AL from Portugal here,

regarding your summary in this player while you reverted me, i don't know if it's a misunderstanding or not...You say he played for first team (only once), but to what [first] team are you referring? Rayo Vallecano or Atlético Madrid? If it's the former, i follow Spanish football thoroughly, and i don't remember it (plus, if i did not remember but he did feature in official games for Rayo's A-side, it would appear in his BDFUTBOL.com profile, it does not). What was it exactly you meant, give me a piece of your "wiki-mind".

Hence, i removed the RAYO VALLECANO FOOTBALLERS category, not the ATLETICO MADRID FOOTBALLERS one, that one is 100% correct. I don't think players who only appear for reserves one year should get the cat, if something we should create the RAYO VALLECANO B FOOTBALLERS cat.

If you do choose to revert me again, fair enough, i'll respect your approach, but please at least: 1 - reply to this message; 2 - don't just click undo, because it will also revert my other changes regarding his new club which were good. Insert the category only or tell me to, i'll oblige.

Attentively, happy weekend --AL (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hope your break was a fruitful one, welcome back! Now, can i be offered a few words in feedback on the subject please? --AL (talk) 02:31, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Noguera

Fair enough, i guess i won't be having your two cents about this situation (see above). I'll now cease bothering you. Also, profit from the opportunity to say i'll leave WP for good at the end of the 2014 FIFA World Cup, it will have been a good eight-year run.

Have a good life, regards from Portugal --Mattythewhite (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blackpool, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FK Liepājas Metalurgs squad

Template:FK Liepājas Metalurgs squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tangerines. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tangerines. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tangerines. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South West Challenge Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South West Challenge Cup, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South West Challenge Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.