User talk:Piculo
Well done for your hard work in updating Jakarta Stock Exchange to Indonesia Stock Exchange in the articles that link to it. The changes may be small, but they make Wikipedia better. Regards Davidelit (Talk) 17:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
January 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kabupaten, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kabupaten was changed by Piculo (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-01-10T18:41:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
With your edits you've broken the three revert rule on the ETA page. I suggest that you self revert. I could report you for that but I would prefer it if you discussed changes on the talk page as myself and another editor have asked. Valenciano (talk) 09:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
WP:3RR report
[edit]I've reported you here for breach of WP:3RR. Valenciano (talk) 08:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello Piculo,
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them.
~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 08:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY>Fireworks!< 23:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for January 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maros Regency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jsharpminor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to ETA, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jsharpminor (talk) 02:47, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
You have already been blocked once for edit warring on that page. I'm disappointed that you've returned to edit war there to add questionable "facts." That is a controversial article, and per WP:BRD if you are reverted, you should seek consensus on the talk page for any changes. You have already been informed of that, so continuing to add your own POV, could lead to sanctions against you. Please use the talk page of the article to discuss changes. Valenciano (talk) 20:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Jsharpminor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Mikemoral♪♫ 08:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Global Underground Passport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not satisfy WP:NALBUM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 23:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)