User talk:HypeBoy


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #252

FAC peer reviews list

Articles seeking peer review
before featured article candidacy

May 30 Chinese characters
June 6 Jenna Ortega
July 17 Pagtatag!
July 18 Henry Clay Work
July 23 Tulsa King
July 29 Sport in Vatican City
July 29 Beebo the God of War
August 2 Dexter's Laboratory
August 15 1939 Liechtenstein putsch
August 23 River
August 26 Tropical Storm Kai-tak
August 29 Ivan the Terrible (1945 film)
September 3 A Space for the Unbound
September 17 Lock's Quest
September 27 Pearl (X)
September 28 Tesla Model S
September 30 Lake Michigan Monster
October 1 Gao Qifeng
October 4 Cisnormativity
October 16 Veiqia
October 19 Virtual Self (EP)
October 19 Claire Redfield
October 21 Crohn's Disease
October 22 Stingless bee
October 23 Eat Bulaga!
October 23 Austin J. Tobin Plaza
October 29 William D. Hoard
October 29 Andrea Navagero
October 30 Mind

Unanswered peer reviews

This user finds your edit summary: not guilty!

	Some post-trial confetti for you!
	Saw your edit summary for Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney. Good job attributing the text to the Ace Attorney article! That was the right thing to do. If you'd like to investigate more, please feel free to head over to Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Cheers, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BLP material at Harashta Haifa Zahra

Apologies in advance if my revert at Harashta Haifa Zahra was in error, but I could not find the subject's religion in either article used to source that sentence. As you know we must be very careful with biographies of living people. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri: No, you're right, I double checked the sources and didn't find information about her religion, it's error on my part (apologies). I thought I'd put her religion in the first section because the info is mentioned in this section as well, and I forgot to move the sources, which (after another check) apparently have no information about her religion either. May I ask why you didn't also remove the info in the section I mentioned? Best, — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 17:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A) I didn't see it. B) Before I made more changes to the article, I wanted to see your response. Now I've removed the unverifiable material at the other section, too. Cheers ☆ Bri (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri: I see. Thank you! Best, — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 19:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Hi, In reply to your question: Kindly explain why Miss USA 2023 and similar articles use this style of short description, then. The majority of pageant articles in my experience don't follow the manual of style, are poorly written, and have little notability, and lack sources. Poorly written short descriptions are the norm, and as a result are truncated on mobile platforms. Note that comparing a practice with other pages that have the same practice WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not justification for continuing to do it against MOS. Hope that helps. Sciencefish (talk) 08:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sciencefish: I'm afraid I have to disagree a bit because A) Miss USA articles that I mentioned do not have the problems that you listed, you can tell just by actually reading the articles (e.g. They aren't lacking in sources) and B) Per WP:SDAVOID, There is no objection to an otherwise-suitable short description that also happens to work as a definition. I changed the short description to distinguish the article further from similar articles (e.g. Miss Universe Indonesia) by emphasizing the pageant's edition. I hope this clears up the confusion. Cheers. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of BL dramas has been accepted

List of BL dramas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism-only account

Are you going to do something about this troll or not? Do you need more insults and personal attacks directed towards me to prove that this guy is WP:NOTHERE? GenoV84 (talk) 22:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help, I appreciate it. GenoV84 (talk) 23:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

DanCherek (talk) 01:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi. I saw that you accepted an unsourced addition to 1996 recently. I have reverted this change, in line with Wikipedia:DOYCITE. All new entries must include an inline citation to back up the date. Deb (talk) 15:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: Noted, thank you. But may I ask why a lot of the entries there don't have an inline citation? I'm still unfamiliar with DOY lists. Best, — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 20:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because this rule came in during 2018 and since then we've been playing catchup. So the ones that are still unreferenced tend to hang around until we have time to do something with them. If you look at the histories of these articles, you'll see a lot of reverted edits resulting from people adding unsourced content that is then removed by someone else. However, a few of the Year and Date articles are now in good shape because of editors who've done a lot of work adding references and removing entries that can't be verified. Please do feel free to join in the effort. :-) Deb (talk) 08:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: Will keep that in mind! Thank you for explaining, and cheers. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 08:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RIIZE edit

I literally added a citation to the edit I made the article I made for RIIZE that you notified me about. Noahbecksleftab (talk) 16:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You mean this article? This article doesn't have any mention about the "boycott" and "bullying" you wrote in your edit. All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable by reliable source(s) that directly support the claim. Please familiarize yourself with WP:PROOF because it's one of the three core content policies in Wikipedia. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was "Itts"

I don't know how someone changed "Itts" to "NQCC", and the reversion of my edit. It was my request, not other IP's. 88.235.228.63 (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I assumed it wasn't you since your IP doesn't match the requester. Have restored your edit. Cheers. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 19:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ariel Han moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ariel Han. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer: Hello, I'm afraid you're mistaken, I didn't create the article, Sunuraju did. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 19:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]