User talk:MrOllie
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
ZEB Certification
[edit]Want to know why the ZEB Certification and Australia parts in ZEB was deleted. Purplewhalethunder (talk) 03:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- It was full of unsourced claims. See WP:V. MrOllie (talk) 11:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how Australia government's site can be a bad source. I know I'm bugging you but I really want to know what I'm doing wrong.
- Australia
- National trajectory
- In Australia, the Trajectory for Low Energy Buildings and its Addendum were agreed by all Commonwealth, state and territory energy ministers in 2019.
- The Trajectory is a national plan that aims to achieve zero energy and carbon-ready commercial and residential buildings in Australia. It is a key initiative to address Australia’s 40% energy productivity improvement target by 2030 under the National Energy Productivity Plan. On 7 July 2023, the Energy and Climate Change Ministerial Council agreed to update the Trajectory for Low Energy Buildings by the end of 2024.
- The updates to the Trajectory will:
- support the delivery of a low energy, net zero emissions residential and commercial building sector by 2050
- consider the success of the existing program
- help develop the policy pathway for the building sector to achieve net zero by 2050.
- Purplewhalethunder (talk) 02:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Luis Elizondo page and BLP
[edit]Good luck, seems to be a mess. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
On this topic, I think it would be best to wait for RS to catch up. I suspect that in a few months there will be plenty of sources identifying Elizondo as a conspiracy theorist...assuming of course that any serious outlets even bother to report on his book. WP:NORUSH and all that. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
prayers
[edit]show love 170.203.4.197 (talk) 14:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Joshua Kelley
[edit]Why are you being such a baby reverting "influencers" to "extremists." "Extremist" is partisan and biased. It violates Wiki's view neutrality: "All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias" 92.36.145.169 (talk) 18:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- WP:NPOV does not mean false balance. If the sources say extremeist (and they do) so will Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 18:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sources? One source, Queerty. Hardly impartial/neutral. False balance? You mean no balance. 92.36.145.169 (talk) 18:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how Wikipedia works. MrOllie (talk) 18:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you have anything else to say on this topic, direct it to the article's associated talk page. My user talk is the wrong venue. MrOllie (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how Wikipedia works. MrOllie (talk) 18:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sources? One source, Queerty. Hardly impartial/neutral. False balance? You mean no balance. 92.36.145.169 (talk) 18:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)