Talk:TeamXbox

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-08-13. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

POV

Most of this is POV nonsense: is there any reason why this shouldn't be listed for deletion? -- Fr a ncs2000 16:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's all relative man... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tieno007 (talk • contribs) 16:20, May 21, 2006

Oh look here , free advertisement for Teamxbox! Just because they're bought by IGN doesn't make them special. They are the epitome of unprofessionalism. Their message forum is garbage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsngwii (talk • contribs) 22:16, August 6, 2006

Link?

Are there any sources for those remarks?

Notability

This article needs sources to verify its claims of notability. --Elonka 22:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's page 1 google ranked for an Xbox search, it's been on xbox.com's affilates list since the original launch, and it has a high Alexia's rating, and is among one of the largest forums on the internet according to bigboards. 74.33.13.26 04:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.big-boards.com/board/116/

Furthermore, one might equally contend that it is not the responsibility of a lone wikipedia vigilante to overrule other, long accepted practices at Wikipedia which include the listing of IGN's other network sites which are similar in size and reach to TeamXbox. The list is at the bottom of the wikipedia article. This organizational structure, if successfully challenged, would have to fairly result in the 'movement' and not 'deletion' of all of these sites under the larger IGN network section, which would make access to the information prohibitively difficult as IGN network membership is not a primary or obvious characteristic for those that might seek information on any of these sites. IGN network membership is an established de facto verification of the site's claim to notability. As such, this article 'needs' nothing.

OTL

FTMFW!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.101.60 (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on TeamXbox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080610115253/http://www.teamxbox.com:80/ to http://www.teamxbox.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]