Talk:Hymenophyllum axsmithii
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Hymenophyllum axsmithii appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 22:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the filmy fern Hymenophyllum axsmithii was suggested to be closer in relation to a neotropical species group and not a local native species?
- Source: Pigg et al (2001) page 804 "Similarly, the new record of Hymenophyllum axsmithii as a member of subgenus Sphaerocionium and morphologic similarities to extant epiphytic humid tropical montane forest species of Sphaerocionium highlight climatic and biogeographical linkages between the early Eocene Okanogan Highlands of the Pacific Northwest of North America and the Neotropics. ...the family in the region, which today hosts a single species, Hymenophyllum wrightii" (in a different subgenus per Chang et al 2022 " Subgenus Mecodium"
- ALT1: ... that researchers want Hymenophyllum axsmithii rhizomes so they can tell if the filmy fern was up a tree? Source: Pigg et al (2021) page 803 "Currently, the fossil record for Hymenophyllaceae reviewed in this article is not sufficiently robust, particularly with respect to critical features of the rhizome, to establish the presence of an epiphytic growth form. ... Clearly, finding additional fossil representatives of Hymenophyllaceae with rhizomes will be essential for documenting the origin and evolution of the epiphytic growth habit within this family.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Strobilanthes tonkinensis
Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 358 past nominations.
Kevmin § 20:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC).
- For ALT1 since it is probably more interesting to the average person than ALT0. I would recommend linking "rhizomes" in the hook. PrimalMustelid (talk) 22:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- B-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- B-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- B-Class Okanagan articles
- Low-importance Okanagan articles
- WikiProject Okanagan articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- B-Class Eastern Washington task force articles
- Unknown-importance Eastern Washington task force articles
- Eastern Washington task force articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles