Talk:Boulderclough
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 14 January 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Boulderclough → Boulder Clough – Correct name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- Is it? I'm seeing 62,500 references to Boulderclough and only 14,600 for boulder clough. Unless I see some evidence to the contrary, I oppose per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:GOOGLETEST. --В²C ☎ 21:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose There isn't always a correct name, and Ordnance Survey doesn't always use the most common form - for some places it has different spellings depending on which data are used. Peter James (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I would note that there is Boulder Clough Bethel Chapel which is referred to as being in Boulder Clough. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.