This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from Book of Common Prayer (1662) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 May 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I would like to thank everyone who helped me offline with this page, what I consider my greatest work to date. Happy Easter! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As a concession to the Yank who made this page, deference to American English is my preference. Noticed a lot had been changed to bring it to British English, but frankly many of the sources I used were in American English. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Afterwriting: Using British spellings might seem relevant, but considering the truly global application of this text, it's production before Modern British English, and the pluralit of sources in this article coming from the United States, I tend towards American English. Prefer discussion here (as was already started) to reversions. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is a primarily British subject, therefore British English is expected regardless of your preferences or tendencies. There is already a British English tag in the article which you and all other editors should respect and follow. Afterwriting (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The tag was added by an editor who made British English edits that ignored actual spellings when implementing their edits. This is a general topic, either variant is acceptable. If an article is already in one variant of English and the topic is general, just ditch/replace the tag instead of revising the whole article piecemeal; you could easily miss something. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The editor who added the tag did the appropriate and correct thing. It is not a "general topic" (whatever that means), it is historically and predominantly a British topic and, therefore, British English is clearly the correct variant (as expected by the MOS, not any editor's personal preference) and needs to be used consistently throughout the article. If I started an article on an historical and predominantly American subject and wrote it in British English then it would be entirely appropriate for other editors to revise the article, piecemeal or otherwise, into American English. Afterwriting (talk) 16:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
New enough, certainly long enough, copyvio free (excepting some false positives on Earwig) neutral, QPQ done. May 19 suggestion has merit. Coretheapple (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
New enough, certainly long enough, copyvio free (excepting some false positives on Earwig) neutral, QPQ done. May 19 suggestion has merit. Coretheapple (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)