Jump to content

Talk:Students' Islamic Movement of India

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Disputes

[edit]

"The stated mission of SIMI is the ‘liberation of India’ from western materialistic cultural influence and to convert it into an Islamic society"..is that accurate? If so these people need to be stopped using any means possible even forcefully if required. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.133.14 (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a whole bunch of nonsense (anti-India POV) in the article. It basically accuses Indian government of attacking and defaming SIMI on false charges. Rama's arrow 03:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SIMI is a group of Islamic workers.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hkelkar's edits

[edit]

Finally made this encyclopedic. Thank you. Otherwise this was SIMI's mouthpiece.Bakaman Bakatalk 00:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorist

[edit]

Nowhere on the sources does it claim that SIMI is a terrorist org. It may be banned, but "terrorist" is dubious. Mar de Sin Talk to me! 20:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will make edits that used "fundamentalist" instead, which is what the main ext link calls SIMI. Mar de Sin Talk to me!
Satp's headng is "Terrorism".Bakaman Bakatalk 02:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A heading is only slightly relevant to the text, especially when the heading is slapped onto hundreds of other articles. So find something else. Mar de Sin Talk to me! 02:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And if SIMI is truly a terrorist org, then there would be other sources declaring that. Mar de Sin Talk to me! 02:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SATP satisfies WP:Reliable Sources.Hkelkar 04:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here are some other refs declaring SIMI as terrorist:


(!!!these following webpages does not exist!!!). This page should be deleted.


http://www.observerindia.com/analysis/A612.htm

Radical Islamist: http://www.jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2369953

Linked to terrorist movements: http://www.jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2369953

http://www.tkb.org/Group.jsp?groupID=4255

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Students Islamic Movement of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorist Organization

[edit]

@Ratnahastin @NXcrypto @LukeEmily @Doug Weller

These sources define Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) as a terror group.- [1][2]. On the official website of Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, it is clearly Written " DESIGNATED AS ‘TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS' " , can be confirmed here.

My edits were reverted many times, despite providing verifiable sources. Please help. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We already say what the right wing government of India calls it. BUT, "Value-laden labels – such as calling an organization a cult, an individual a racist, sexist, terrorist, or freedom fighter, or a sexual practice a perversion – may express contentious opinion and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution".
So who else says it is a terrorist organisation? Doug Weller talk 09:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]