Jump to content

User contributions for 103.222.20.146

Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

12 February 2020

3 February 2020

26 January 2020

25 January 2020

6 January 2020

4 January 2020

3 January 2020

31 December 2019

22 December 2019

21 December 2019

20 December 2019

  • 17:1617:16, 20 December 2019 diff hist −13 TaxilaIncluding or excluding Afghanistan does not make the term 'indian subcontinent' global. This term is not even used by local countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, forget about international communities.  Everywhere the term 'South Asia' is used, officially and unofficially.So kindly don't put any even locally unaccepted word in a global portal like Wikipedia. If you have any 'logical logic' against the term 'South Asia', then kindly explain that in nationalism. Thank you.

19 December 2019

  • 01:4501:45, 19 December 2019 diff hist −9 TaxilaNeither any international organization (like UN, EU, Commonwealth), nor any international media (like BBC, CNN) use the term 'Indian Subcontinent', all use 'South Asia' to indicate this specific area of the world. Wikipedia is also an international portal, not a bollywood site. So kindly don't use local term here instead of global term.

18 December 2019

5 December 2019

  • 04:3304:33, 5 December 2019 diff hist −15 BaulThis box is about the recognition from UNESCO, which was given specifically to Bangladesh's Baul heritage, not of India

30 November 2019

29 November 2019

12 October 2019