User talk:HÊÚL.

Welcome!

Hello, HÊÚL., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! †Bloodpack† 14:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source for Image:Nelly.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nelly.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1989 (Demo)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 1989 (Demo), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HÊÚL., where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Martin451 00:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Your recent editing history at List of films based on Marvel Comics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting entries from The End (comics)

Hello. Why do you keep removing Marvel: The End and Spider-Girl: The End? The list just feels incomplete to me without them. I can be flexible on the She-Hulk issue, as it was the last issue of her 2004 ongoing series, but the other two really should be included. If you need my references or outside sources, Comic Book DB's The End page is where most of my information on the subject came from.

I'm also not interested in splitting hairs (with anyone) on the similar themes section. I didn't originally add the titles you removed, I just added them back. You obviously don't agree with the inclusion of some of the titles within the list, and I don't know enough about them to argue for their reinstatement, but someone else felt they belonged on the page. If they feel like championing why those titles belong here, it's not me they'd have to convince. KnightOfMars83 (talk) 07:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I understand your reasoning, BUT, they still use the same banner as the other limited series. If they weren't intended to be part of that specific "series" of books, then why use that logo? Marvel could have simply chosen another title for Marvel: The End or Spider-Girl: The End, yet they didn't. KnightOfMars83 (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if I am wrong, and there are obviously others that came to the same conclusion as me, wouldn't the page benefit from mentioning those specific titles and addressing your perspective? This way the titles are still mentioned, and there is an explanation as to why, even though they bare the logo on their covers, they aren't part of the line. Think about it: if they were mentioned already we wouldn't be having this conversation right now. At the very least add them to the comics with similar themes section.

I would be interested to see if there are any other users who agree or disagree with either one of us on the talk page. I see one other user thinks the page should be deleted, and honestly, I kind of agree with them. If Hulk and Punisher have their own pages, and they are only single issues, then all of the titles should have their own pages and The End (comics) should solely exist as a category page. Or better yet, those pages should be folded into their respective characters alternate versions sections. With the exception of the limited series, why do they each need their own unique page? KnightOfMars83 (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Savn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Savn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

stop

Please, stop. Your editions in WWE Roster were reversed by two users. You can't include develoment roster and main roster. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 23:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes. 1, you put all the NXT brodcast team in the main roster. 2, JBL full ringname is John Bradshaw Layfield, not JBL (yes, his titantron and WW profile says JBL, but he stills refered as John Bradshaw Layfield). 3, the referees, you haven't a source about them as referees. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About JBL, JBl means John Bradshaw Layfield, but the ringname is John Bradshaw Layfield, not JBL. JBL is to short, but the real ringname is John Bradshaw, like MVP ringname was Montel Vontavious Porter. The WWE profile refered him as John Bradshaw Layfield and other websites refered him as John Bradshaw Layfield, JBL it to short the name, but no the oficial ringname. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm Vjmlhds. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of WWE personnel because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Where are you getting this AJ is pregnant stuff. Looks like vandalism to me. Vjmlhds 02:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Vjmlhds. I noticed that you made a comment on the page [[:user talk:Vjmlhds]] that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Personal attacks...not a good idea.

Also I'm not the only editor that has reverted your changes, so that should say something as well. Vjmlhds 02:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Vjmlhds. I noticed that you made a comment on the page user talk:Vjmlhds that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If starting a response on someone's talk page with "Are you crazy" isn't an example of a personal attack, I don't know what is. Vjmlhds 03:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NXT current logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NXT current logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iron Man (2008 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:FILMRELEASE: "Release dates should therefore be restricted to the film's earliest release, whether it was at a film festival, a world premiere, or a public release, and the release date(s) in the country or countries that produced the film."--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Street Fighter II: The Animated Movie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sources

Maybe, you should learn about sources. A source isn't "big cass used this theme at NXT on June..." It's not a source. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 01:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have to find reliable sources. For example, Enzo Amore sourced theme. It's ITunes, where you can confirm Enzo Amore used this theme. Or a TV/PPV Report. Sources prove Enzo (and Cass) used the music. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content stating that Etrian Odyssey is a spinoff of the Megami Tensei series. As far as I've ever seen, on is not classified as as spinoff of the other, they're merely just developed by the same company. Please provide a reliable sources that shows that Atlus directly states the spinoff status, or stop making this edit. If you continue to make edits without a reliable source backing it, or without a consensus backing your decision, it is considered disruptive editing and you may be blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 12:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]