User:Factomancer
Wikitruthiness
NOT A PERSONAL ATTACK (according to SarekOfVulcan)
[1] - Get over yourself. You finally ran out of things to say so you resort again to personal attacks about her English level? Anyone with half a brain can understand what she meant, and I know you have that, so please don't pretend to be dumb.
- Completely unnecessary and hostile
- Accuses other editor of "playing dumb" and of not being sincere
- Accuses other editor of having "half a brain" for not understanding "And how exactly did it cause to that my post removed?"
- Tells user to "get over yourself" a common insult implying that the user is arrogant or egotistical
PERSONAL ATTACK (according to SarekOfVulcan)
[2] - "And how exactly did it cause to that my post removed?" Sorry, but that is not proper English. I can't understand you.
- Polite, civil request for clarification
- True (And how exactly did it cause to that my post removed? _isn't_ comprehensible English)
- Uses "sorry"
- Other users have also had problems with this user's English in the past ([3], [4])
As you can see, on Wikipedia innocence is no defense.
I am your bitch
The Wikipedia personal attack rules apparently don't apply to insults directed at me. Everyone is free to call me names and treat me like a subhuman and the admins won't do a thing. In fact, insult me all you want and I will get banned for asking you to stop!
Racism on Wikipedia
Because hate speech isn't hate speech when its about Arabs. Complain about users inserting Stormfront material into Wikipedia and they will be banned in the blink of an eye. Complain about users inserting material from Masada 2000 onto Wikipedia and you will get hit in the face with a fish.