User talk:GreenReaper

Talk archives

April 2005 - November 2006
December 2006 - April 2009

Note: Please do not message or email me eliciting my support for an article unless it's in a topic area I'm already involved in. Thanks! :-) GreenReaper

Cat

Your userpage was below the minimum cat quota. But don't worry - I've fixed it for you. Ceiling Cat (talk) 00:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MPOGD cite on Furcadia

Are you sure it's a republished press release from DEP? It does read like a press release, but MPOGD may have fact-checked Dr. Cat's "first MMO to be online for 10 years continuously" claim, and put it forth with their own seal of approval. Perhaps I'm giving them too much credit, though.... -kotra (talk) 02:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See the (window) title of this page, and compare the text. GreenReaper (talk) 03:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've adjusted the citation accordingly. Tsk. The lack of non-DEP-written sources are a problem. I wonder if I should send an email to DEP asking if they know of any news articles or such about Furcadia. Given their well-known lack of response to emails and my ...hazardous relationship with them, it's probably a lost cause, but.... -kotra (talk) 03:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GreenReaper. You have new messages at Griffinofwales's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Griffinofwales (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GreenReaper. You have new messages at Griffinofwales's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Griffinofwales (talk) 19:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GreenReaper. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Reward board.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Griffinofwales (talk) 03:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RB

Per comments made here, could you please leave a time stamp on your post at WP:RB, and I am undoing your edit to the top of WP:RB, also per the comments made at WT:RB. Thank you. Griffinofwales2 (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a timestamp in the page history. I refuse to add another one. You are trying to make the process needlessly bureaucratic. GreenReaper (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-Conference New York Update: 3 weeks to go

For those of you who signed up early, Wiki-Conference New York has been confirmed for the weekend of July 25-26 at New York University, and we have Jimmy Wales signed on as a keynote speaker.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-Conference New York panel

We have moved your "Barnraisings and cross-wiki collaborations" panel from slot B-3 on Sunday to slot B-2 on Saturday, to avoid a scheduling conflict. Thanks!--Pharos (talk) 17:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, it would also be good if you folks could make some preparations among yourselves about how best to work together on the panel. I'll be sending you all an e-mail on this soon.--Pharos (talk) 17:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of T.H.E. Fox

Hello! Your submission of T.H.E. Fox at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

Yes indeed! This is a furry snail! See periostracum

Just wanted to say how much I enjoyed being on the Panel with you at the Conference, and to thank you, not only for your excellent talk, which was a perfect lead-in to Clockworksoul's talk and mine, but also for being so considerate about cueing up our talks and so on. It was great to meet you. If you live in this general area, as you may have seen, I can get you into any museum for free, so let me know if that would be helpful sometime. Oh and if that was your camera, I would love a copy of the photo of us three. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 22:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had a nice time too - I felt the talks and the questions together were very informative. And here's the photo. I think it came out well! :-)

I live over in Detroit, but if I return at some point, perhaps I could take you up on that offer. Either way, good luck with your projects, both on- and off-wiki. GreenReaper (talk) 02:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great to meet you!

It was great to finally meet you in person. Best of luck with your pursuits, Furry and otherwise! - Clockwork Soul 18:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise - and I'm sure they'll go just fine. :-) GreenReaper (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for T.H.E. Fox

On July 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article T.H.E. Fox, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 07:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green

Hi GreenReaper, Just wanted to let you know that in a thrift store in California (visiting my in-laws) I bought myself a pair of apple-green jeans, and also another hoodie, a green tropical patterned one. I enjoyed my green outfit so much at the conference, and your appreciation of my being in green helped make me realize even more how great it really is. So thanks for the inspiration. Say hello to your avatar for me, Invertzoo (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*grins* - well, I'll be wearing green myself for the next five days, as I'm flying to RainFurrest in a couple of hours. I'll be sure to let him know once I unpack him from the overhead compartment . . . GreenReaper (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skin

Hello,

I'm in charge of a regiowiki called Wiki-Brest, I'm looking for a skin to make more attract the wiki.

I searched to the net on these websites :

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Gallery_of_user_styles (there are no screenprint, no files .php .deps.php and no folder in download. So I'm lost.
http://paulgu.com/wiki/Mediawiki_Skins
http://mediawiki2u.com/

Could you help me to find beautiful and ergonomic skins ?

Maybe you know some companies which could develop skins.

Thanks you. Sorry for my bad english, i'm french Filyg (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC) contact @ wiki-brest.net[reply]

I may not be the best adviser for custom skins, as I campaigned for our host (Wikia) to keep the Monobook skin, and even moved a wiki to its own hosting because it was being removed. But still . . .

Firstly, MediaWiki is adding a new standard skin called Vector, which you can try on the English Wikipedia (and possibly the French one). It is not ready yet, but it will probably be in the next major release of the software in a few months. If you like it, perhaps that would be sufficient. See http://usability.wikimedia.org/ for more details.

On the gallery of user styles page, there are many skins available for download. Some *are* full skins, but these are packaged in zip files or on other sites. I do not think PHP is an enabled file format on the wiki.

Many of the skins are CSS modifications of Monobook. This may be good, as Monobook is likely to be updated with new features, and a modification of it is less likely to break with new versions. If you wish to try these, you can put the CSS in the MediaWiki:Monobook.css page on your wiki, or upload the file somewhere and @import it from there. You could also copy Monobook under a new name and override that instead.

Some sites have made or modified their own skins, for example tfwiki.net and aboutus.org. If you like what they did, perhaps they could give or sell you a copy. If you want to make your own, you could try this book.

You could also try asking on the Wikipedia IRC channel or MediaWiki and WikiTech mailing lists. GreenReaper (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas K. Dye as merge. User:Barberio disputed this close and opened a deletion review, which was closed as the admin argued that merge closes are not considered at DRV. I merged the material to Newshounds and redirected the article; Barberio has reverted the redirect, though the material remains merged. A discussion on the merge is at Talk:Newshounds#Merge of Thomas K. Dye; your participation would be welcome. Fences&Windows 01:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Dear Greenreaper,

Our vision for Wikipedia is one of beauty, natural symmetry and light.

I wish you a Happy New Year, everything good for your family, your loved ones and yourself, peace and joy for all the people of the world. I also wish a joyful and peaceful expansion for Wikipedia, may it bring helpful, generous, and peaceful information to everyone in the world.
All the very best from Invertzoo (talk) 19:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:WindowFX drag out transition.gif

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it can. It's not a complicated concept. Read the image description page. (Also, you got the image name wrong, I fixed it.) GreenReaper (talk) 20:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which means that the image as a whole has to be treated as non-free- IE, not be plastered in free content templates. J Milburn (talk) 20:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, looking at the image, the background (the non-free part) is not important, and the main focus of the image is freely licensed. As such, the image should be recreated without the non-free components. J Milburn (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead. I spent far too much of my life getting that image onto Wikipedia in the first place for me to bother. GreenReaper (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Object Desktop 2 Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Object Desktop 2 Logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DesktopX Theme.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DesktopX Theme.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:ObjectBar Theme Autumn.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ObjectBar Theme Autumn.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DirectSkin screenshot.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DirectSkin screenshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:ObjectDock Screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ObjectDock Screenshot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Stardock Central screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stardock Central screenshot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Galactic Civilizations OS2 screenshot.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Galactic Civilizations OS2 screenshot.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:TweakVista.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TweakVista.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for File:StyleVista.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:StyleVista.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BootSkin Creatures Eggs16.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BootSkin Creatures Eggs16.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:GalacticCivilizationsIIColony.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GalacticCivilizationsIIColony.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:GalacticCivilizationsIICustomShip.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GalacticCivilizationsIICustomShip.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MidwestFurFest2005VarietyShowEnd.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:MidwestFurFest2005VarietyShowEnd.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TweakVista.png

A tag has been placed on File:TweakVista.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:WinCustomize Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WinCustomize Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Atomic Mouse issue 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Atomic Mouse issue 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Atomic Mouse Shanda Fantasy Arts issue 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Atomic Mouse Shanda Fantasy Arts issue 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:GalCiv2DarkAvatarBoxShot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GalCiv2DarkAvatarBoxShot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TweakVista.png deleted

Please see this page for information on donating copyrighted material. Looking over your page, I would strongly recommend that you stop uploading images until you have a better undertsanding of our image use policy or you may end up being blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion of File:TweakVista.png was incorrect. I had permission to upload the image under the stated license (which was later converted to include CC-BY-SA), and I did so in the correct manner. A message to OTRS is not required for those works which you yourself have created. Please undelete it.

Bear in mind that most of the other images were uploaded in 2005. At that time, a detailed fair-use image rationale was not required. All of the above messages were added in the space of a few minutes, a couple of hours ago. I cannot address them all at once, yet I still placed a hangon template on this image. It was apparently ignored. GreenReaper (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stardock Fences.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stardock Fences.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop posting robotic messages to people's talk pages

Please stop posting robotic messages to people's talk pages when they edit an article you are monitoring. ~ Agvulpine (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't. I typed that in manually. No script or bot was used. GreenReaper (talk) 18:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cat reversions on MUCKs

Seriously, in 2010 we're still doing the TinyParochialism where we don't want to be MUDs because MUDs are stupid kill-the-monster games? Come on. That isn't helping anybody, not with the way the community has evaporated. We have enough problems on Wikipedia without insisting on fragmenting ourselves for archaic reasons. If it helps, I can also produce reliable source citations spelling out that MUD is a generic, not anything implying combat or any other particular sort of game, and in fact encompasses "MU*" (counterintuitively, obviously). —chaos5023 (talk) 14:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should recategorize Category:MU* games under Category:MUD games rather than adding all members of that category to Category:MUD games. GreenReaper (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that seems pretty sensible. —chaos5023 (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz ^talk 02:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template help

I saw your hack for having a sortable template with {{Furry-con-list-start}} and {{Furry-con-list-entry}} with column spanning and wanted to know if you knew of a way to make the main column headings span and unsorotable while having secondary column headings sortable. I would like to use this with a visual novel listing currently at work on my page, but am running into issues with the sub headings. The desired format, minus the sortability, is on my userspace.陣内 _Jinnai 06:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-Conference NYC (2nd annual)

Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Elemental: War of Magic TOC

It didn't break the layout, but it did look very strange having both the infobox and TOC right-aligned. Feel free to change it back if you want. —Slicing (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"S comes before T"

"Alphabetize" would have sufficed. It wasn't intuitively obvious to me that the entries were in alphabetical order rather than some sort of priority order, which I suppose is a failing on my part, but the failing wasn't that I don't know the order of the Latin alphabet. —chaos5023 (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ozy and Millie

If it's so freaking notable, why is there absolutely no non-trivial secondary source coverage? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWikiAuth

Hi There. I run a large wiki on Wikia, and we're considering a move back to being self-hosted. As you no doubt know, we can take the dump but not the user accounts. Obviously this is not just annoying for users who have to re-register, but dangerous as any randomer could register another users' account. The MediaWikiAuth extension would be absolutely great to help us deal with this. Even if we can't copy preferences, is there any chance we can get hold of the extension? Thanks - Gerard^talk 18:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have put a copy of the latest internal version of this extension here. Please note that it has not been tested with 1.16, or indeed outside WikiFur at all. It should work with the token changes introduced recently. I strongly suggest reading through the code to understand what it does. You will need a copy of Snoopy and configuration similar to the following:

 $wgMediaWikiAuthAPIURL = 'http://www.wikia.com/api.php';
 $wgMediaWikiAuthPrefsURL = 'http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Preferences';
 require_once($IP.'/extensions/MediaWikiAuth/MediaWikiAuth.php');
 $wgAuth = new MediaWikiAuthPlugin();

GreenReaper (talk) 21:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - very nicely commented code (rare to see)! It seems to need a table to be set up - do you have the schema or sql for that handy? Gerard^talk 23:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, local_users? It shouldn't be required since it also searches for past editors' names in the revision table, and probably isn't available to you anyway - we got a database dump which happened to have it in and used it as a shortcut - but here you go.

mysql> describe local_users;
+-------------+-----------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field       | Type            | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-------------+-----------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| user_name   | varchar(255)    | NO   | PRI |         |       |
| user_id     | int(5) unsigned | NO   | UNI | 0       |       |
| numgroups   | bigint(21)      | NO   |     | 0       |       |
| singlegroup | char(16)        | NO   |     | NULL    |       |
| rev_cnt     | int(11)         | NO   |     | 0       |       |
+-------------+-----------------+------+-----+---------+-------+

Again, you could probably cut out the section that involves it and and it would work just fine - at least, for users who've actually made any contributions to the wiki. Or you could just have it try every username, and figure out some kind of cache (I strongly recommend not hammering their login servers with repeated failed logins). Just be careful; you don't want to run into a userid clash. GreenReaper (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Brandt Question

Hi GreenReaper, Can you take a look at what was posted on Nick Brandt's page. I don't understand what he means. Is it really that bad that the article needs to be deleted. Let me know what you think. Thisandthem (talk) 01:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He took another look and removed the tag. Thisandthem (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Equivamp (talk) 01:10, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Equivamp has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

MediaWiki en.Wiki site software change

Hi. Your input is needed here. If you are not the person who does this, please let me know who to contact. A discussion is taking place to fix the duration of the trial and it is anticipated that the changes are expected to be ready for implementation 11 Aug 03:00 UTC. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From the look of it, the only change necessary from a developer perspective is the addition of the different notice for anonymous users, although it might be possible to handle this in script (or just use a combined message - don't see why you can't just say "you must be logged in, with an account at least X old with Y edits" to both groups). The Wikimedia IT people just need to change the configuration setting determining which user groups can create pages. You should probably file a bug (or two) along these lines, as this is how such changes are tracked and discussed. I'm not personally involved in Wikimedia's infrastructure - I'm too busy running WikiFur! :-) GreenReaper (talk) 19:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fur and Loathing

Good work with the refs. However, if you add them, it might be a good idea to knock out the {{unreferenced}} while you're at it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 16:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikipedeHead37px.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikipedeHead37px.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikipedeHead37px.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikipedeHead37px.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Furry fandom

hello. i understand your need to promote wikifur. however, a single sentence mention does not make it notable. there is an essay on this, but WP:GNG states that in general, a single sentence mention in insufficient to establish notability. :) -badmachine 19:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained elsewhere, Wikipedia's concept of notability relates to whether a subject should have its own article – not whether it should be mentioned in a section of an article about a wider topic, nor whether there should be a redirect to that section from the subject's name. Please read the guideline you are pointing at before trying to use it. GreenReaper (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of furry conventions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of furry conventions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of furry conventions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 22:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RBW nomination

RBW UK has been nominated for deletion. If we're going to save it, then we need more sources than just this Bizarre interview. Do you know of any other sources? Silver seren^C 21:01, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only coverage that springs to mind is in Sugar (WikiFur), which merely identifies RBW (and ConFuzzled) as furry conventions. Personally, I am not convinced that RBW's article is justified. While it can claim to be the first "real" furry convention in the UK, it never had more than 300 attendees; others mentioned here are over 1000, and we don't have all of them. I think it is an excellent example of a convention which should be mentioned here, but not that prominently. GreenReaper (talk) 04:54, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of furry conventions

Can you please respond at Talk:List of furry conventions? No one is going to agree with just allowing any convention in regardless, there has to be some lower limit of verifiability and notability. That's why my proposed "one reliable source discussing a convention" is the baseline of what we're going to get. Silver seren^C 20:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ElementalWarOfMagicLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ElementalWarOfMagicLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:50, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DragonSpires Article

Hi, I wasn't sure if this was something you're "involved with", but the DragonSpires article is probably going to get deleted, and I didn't know if you'd be able to answer anyone's questions on the game/article/etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#DragonSpires Thanks! 4.154.6.11 (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not, hugely, but I'll take a look - thanks for the heads-up! GreenReaper (talk) 08:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback re Wicnic

Hello, GreenReaper. You have new messages at TransporterMan's talk page.
Message added 13:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TransporterMan (TALK) 13:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Zero interest-rate policy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Zero interest-rate policy, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 22:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stalking Cat

Thank you for your recent contributions to Stalking Cat. I understand you actually contributed to one of the refs, at this post. I am interested to expand and improve this article, making it longer and more accurate, adhering to NPOV. I was inspired to do so when I found out about his passing; I was not impressed with the previous state of the article and I though we as a community could do better.

As I just stated to SiriusKarma, I recently went down the list of the edit history for the Talk page and personally contacted other people who previously commented or contributed, in the hopes of drumming up some more assistance with expanding and improving the article. If you are able to provide additional sources or insight as to the shaping of this article, I would appreciate your input at Talk:Stalking_Cat#Major_rewrite. Thank you. Just Tidying Up (talk) 16:27, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

General fixes and Wikipedia-Books in Furry Fandom

The "Wikipedia-Books" item wasn't removed; it was simply relocated from "Further Reading" to "See Also" (q.v.) We probably only need it in one location in that article. —Dajagr (talk) 18:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So it was! Thanks for spotting that. GreenReaper (talk) 20:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Conway Middle Name

Hello there! I don't know how to reply correctly to stuff so I'll put this here and then you can scold me afterwards. Though I do have the definitive source for his middle name and it's straight from his mouth. Here you are sir! I also don't know about the Jr. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0VPvet9biA#t=7204 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexxandere (talk • contribs) 09:28, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's very helpful! I've integrated it into the article, along with a couple of other updates. GreenReaper (talk) 08:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 21 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Troy McClure page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Steve Cross (comedian)

Hello, GreenReaper. You have new messages at Talk:Steve Cross (comedian).
Message added -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Heroin

Hello. Please comment here. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assistance

	WikiFur barnstar
	Thanks for the good IRC talk about WikiFur's inclusion policies and for your assistance in responsibly handling a subject's request to have an undesired article about be removed. From what I can see, you're doing a good job of leading WikiFur! :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 21:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revalidation article "Fursuit"

I'm questioning the mark "Good Article" of the Fursuit. Since you were one of those who contributed to it, I ask your opinion. Keplerbr (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of Fursuit

Fursuit, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Society (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Society (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fred Johansen (talk) 13:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BootSkin

The article BootSkin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established by providing reliable third-party references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Keφr 21:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

You've got email. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Furry

Portal:Furry, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Furry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Furry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GreenReaper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GreenReaper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Furry comics

Template:Furry comics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary removal

You removed some text [here.] I don't care which way the page is left, but you can rest assured that I, who made the original citation, have nothing whatsoever to do with the legal firm (no COI). Seniorexpat (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tales of Beatrix

The article Tales of Beatrix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no sources to prove its existence; fails WP:GNG and WP:NFICT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ironclaw Online

The article Ironclaw Online has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has remained unsourced since creation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Atomic Mouse Shanda Fantasy Arts issue 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Atomic Mouse Shanda Fantasy Arts issue 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BerliCon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BerliCon. Since you had some involvement with the BerliCon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oklacon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oklacon. Since you had some involvement with the Oklacon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All Fur Fun listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect All Fur Fun. Since you had some involvement with the All Fur Fun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:42, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anthrofest listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anthrofest. Since you had some involvement with the Anthrofest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C-ACE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect C-ACE. Since you had some involvement with the C-ACE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:44, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Anthro and Cartooning Expo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Canadian Anthro and Cartooning Expo. Since you had some involvement with the Canadian Anthro and Cartooning Expo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Art and Cartooning Expo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Canadian Art and Cartooning Expo. Since you had some involvement with the Canadian Art and Cartooning Expo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MoreFurCon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MoreFurCon. Since you had some involvement with the MoreFurCon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Furtasticon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Furtasticon. Since you had some involvement with the Furtasticon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ConFurence East listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ConFurence East. Since you had some involvement with the ConFurence East redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Franfurence listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Franfurence. Since you had some involvement with the Franfurence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FranFurence listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect FranFurence. Since you had some involvement with the FranFurence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CritterConDiego listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CritterConDiego. Since you had some involvement with the CritterConDiego redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Califur Diego listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Califur Diego. Since you had some involvement with the Califur Diego redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CaliFur Diego listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CaliFur Diego. Since you had some involvement with the CaliFur Diego redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conifur listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conifur. Since you had some involvement with the Conifur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GreenReaper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GreenReaper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conifur Northwest listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conifur Northwest. Since you had some involvement with the Conifur Northwest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stardockcompanylogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stardockcompanylogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Furry fandom

Portal:Furry fandom, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Furry fandom and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Furry fandom during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Mia's Index of Anthro Stories" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mia's Index of Anthro Stories. Since you had some involvement with the Mia's Index of Anthro Stories redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:25, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"MyFursona" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MyFursona. Since you had some involvement with the MyFursona redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Califur" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Califur. Since you had some involvement with the Califur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DirectSkin

The article DirectSkin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Application doesn't meet the WP:GNG because there isn't significant coverage in reliable third party sources. A search shows only trivial mentions with basic descriptions, and nothing to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 02:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ThinkDesk

The article ThinkDesk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

App does not have significant coverage in reliable third party sources as mandated by the WP:GNG. A search shows primary sources and passing mentions, nothing to establish WP:Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 19:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cost of energy sources

Template:Cost of energy sources has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Druzhby Narodiv (Kyiv Metro)

added a link pointing to European

Heroiv Dnipra (Kyiv Metro)

added a link pointing to Battle of Mariupol

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Druzhby Narodiv (Kyiv Metro), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Dissocial" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dissocial and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 25#Dissocial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you an email

Hello, GreenReaper. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I sent an email to the address I found via Gerrit on Friday - just wanted to check if you had gotten it (or if I should've used a different address!). Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 05:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Furry convention

Furry convention has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Object Desktop logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Object Desktop logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ObjectBar Theme Autumn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ObjectBar Theme Autumn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:Puff phrases" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:Puff phrases has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 25 § Wikipedia:Puff phrases until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]