Jump to content

Talk:Fake Love (BTS song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 04:53, 14 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WP Songs}}, {{WikiProject Hip hop}}, {{WikiProject Korea}}, {{WikiProject Rock music}}, {{WikiProject Japan}}. Remove 6 deprecated parameters: b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

BTS music video

[edit]

During the music video for Fake Love, Jungkook shows his abs, which make girls react weirdly. Can we mention the abs part of the video?

See Here: [1]

Namethatisnotinuse (talk) 00:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Genres

[edit]

Andrzejbanas, I don't know why you feel the statement: The lead track "Fake Love", paired with grunge-rock treatment and emo hip-hop beats suggests that "grunge-rock" is not one of the genres but I think otherwise. Inviting Kyle Peake and LOVI33 for this discussion. --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it says a "treatment". That is to say "give particular properties" of the genre. This is not specifically stating the song belongs to said genre, and that is how it is (or rather, was) presented in the article. I'm not against stating the treatment parts, but saying it was part of the genre based on this source goes against WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Would like to hear from others on the matter though for sure. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

South African chart

[edit]

What happened to the South African chart? I couldn't open that. Please help me to find the error. ("EMA Top 10 Airplay: Week Ending {{{date}}}", notifying @Nkon21, Milkypine, and Paper9oll) Sinsyuan~Talk 14:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sinsyuan Permanent dead link already (the entire website [sa-ema.com] is down already) and also not archived to prevent WP:LINKROT because someone decided to use the rubbish {{Single chart}} instead which doesn't get pickup when bot's archival job are ran regardless of manual job or bulk job. You can try searching through archive.org and/or archive.is instead if you know the exact url as the rubbish template generated a broken one. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, I try to translate this Good Article into Chinese version in order to become a Good Article in Chinese Wikipedia. Nowadays, I can’t check out the South African chart so that I decide to remove this one in my translating page. I would possibly find it out at archive.org to prove this in the future, thank you for asking. Sinsyuan~Talk 15:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this chart should also be removed here also on the grounds that WP:VERIFYing it, is seemingly impossible to do so. I'm not sure if a archived version exists at either archive.org and/or archive.is so I can't search it up as I'm not sure what is exact url formatting to begin with. Maybe someone can have a look at it and decide. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, according to the Milkypine's comment on my Chinese Wikipedia user talk page, there is no archive for South African Chart in 2018. Sinsyuan~Talk 04:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was added because the song did chart in the territory. Despite no archives being saved and it now being a dead link (and therefore cannot be verified all these years later, like some songs with the old French digital chart for which many links were never archived) that is no reason for removal. We can just mark it as a permanently dead link. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 17:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]