User talk:NoonIcarus

Hello

May I please ask why the category of far right politics was removed from Jiminez? He is referred to as right wing in a foreign policy article here: https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/01/23/remembering-the-fall-of-a-venezuelan-strongman/ Firekong1 (talk) 22:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for your message and sorry for the delay. My reason was mostly WP:CATV: the article simply does not mention any reference to far-right politics. The FP article similarly does not mention this, simply describing Pérez Jiménez as a traditional, U.S.-backed right-wing caudillo in the style of Cuba’s Batista. This is covered in categories such as Category:Venezuelan anti-communists. At any rate, his party New Order is already included in the "Far-right political parties in Venezuela" category. If there are sources delving into more detail, I would be happy to complete this information. Happy holidays! --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your response, no need to apologize. I apologize if it seemed like I was attempting to shove a partisan view into the article. I was mistaken adding it as I was subconsciously thinking of other right wing leaders backed by America who have been labeled as far right, such as Pinochet. I’m glad you cleared up that misunderstanding, and I will gladly find legitimate sources that describe Jiminez as far right in good conscience. Oh, and happy holidays to you to as well! Firekong1 (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

@Firekong1: Not at all! No worries, I did not see it that way. Latin America's dictatorships could have different policies and sometimes even be at odds with each others, but all of them were autocracies, so it's totally understandable. Pérez Jiménez policies (especifically economic ones) arguably can be in the middle of the political left/right spectrum, but he would easily fit in the fascism category. I would be eager to help because if there are further sources (and I'm sure that there are) there would be plenty of content that could be used to expand on political views. Happy New Year and happy editing! --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I just wanted to clarify my intention with you because I have made the same mistake in the past, and some Wikipedia editors were not as kind and lenient as you, because they assumed my editing was for a disruptive intent to cause issues rather than a genuine conviction based on legitimate observable evidence. And thank you for your help, I will find more references to support my statements. It’s not just Jiminez that fits in the fascist and far-right category though. Thanks for your statement and your assistance And happy new year to you as well! :) Firekong1 (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

No worries! People sometimes can get jumpy in these moments, particularly when it's about politics, but one of Wikipedia's policies warns about not biting newcomers. If you explain your reasons for the edits or any confusion that you could have, everything should be alright :) Keep calm and carry on: there are many editors that will be happy to help or to guide, and editing can become really fulfilling.

That said, you can let me know if you have other any other questions regarding "rules", editing, or so on. Volunteers are always needed and welcome. Best wishes, --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

	Merry Christmas NoonIcarus
	Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you and yours nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 15:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Thank you so much! Kind regards from the bottom of my heart, I hope this season is the best for you :) --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Season's greetings

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello NoonIcarus: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you very much! I wish you my best, enjoy these holidays as much as possible. --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296 Online events: New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023 Announcement In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part of the #1day1woman initiative! Tip of the month: Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello NoonIcarus: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you! This is so heartwarming. Happy New Year! --NoonIcarus (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Lima Consensus

Hi NoonIcarus

First of all, a happy new year to you and wishing you a pleasant 2024 ahead. Just to note though, your move of the Lima Consensus page has been reverted, initially following a request at WP:RM/TR to revert the undiscussed bold move you had made earlier. You should therefore not reinstate that bold move, unless it is confirmed in a WP:RM discussion. It really doesn't make much difference that it's nominated at AFD, there's nothing in the guidelines that says we have to maintain an undiscussed title just because you happened to nominate the AFD during the brief time that it was at that title. Cheers,  — Amakuru (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for the message, and Happy New Year to you too :) My last move was mostly related to Liz's rationale, who said that the title was the one under which the AfD was filed under.

I also wanted to point out that a disambiguation probably would be beneficial in this case, and that none of the terms seem to have preponderance over one another. Kind regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Simón (2023 film)

The article Simón (2023 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Simón (2023 film) and Talk:Simón (2023 film)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Carolina Chang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carolina Chang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Chang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 00:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

@Novem Linguae: Thank you kindly for the notice. --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Ultranuevo (talk) 04:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Belize–Venezuela relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belize–Venezuela relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belize–Venezuela relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Interstellarity (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Cambodia–Kosovo relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cambodia–Kosovo relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambodia–Kosovo relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

La Salida intro

Just wanted to inform you that I updated the wording in this edit since the previous version was inaccurate. There were no sources discussing "an effort to end to the Bolivarian Revolutionprevalent since 1998", but sources were saying there was "an effort to end to the government of President of Venezuela Nicolás Maduro", so I provided the wording of the latter. Hopefully this is an improvement and appears more neutral to you than the wording "an effort remove Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro" and we can move on from this article. Again, I'm notifying you of this edit out of good faith. WMrapids (talk) 21:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

@WMrapids: Thanks for the notice. This looks like a fair compromise. Regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)