User talk:73.168.15.161

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (73.168.15.161) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 11:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Loki

Hello, I'm SuperCarnivore591. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Loki (comics) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SuperCarnivore591 (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Is Loki a supervillain?. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 12:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Supercarnivore591, Did you undo my changes to Moon Knight? I have to ask why considering the page as it was is plagued with problems. It looks unprofessional. There are multiple spelling mistakes. There is heaps of missing info. There is material included that isn't really relevant and much that can be reduced and summarised such as the section on contributors/inkers etc. Also there is a massively long winded section on issues, and years of publication which I summarised to look better and be more comprehensive. Most of his powers/abilities have not even been included! Why did you change all what I did when it is correct. <~~Matthew 15th/Dec/2015 16:08~~>

Moon Knight page

Supercarnivore591,

Did you undo my changes to Moon Knight? I have to ask why considering the page as it was is plagued with problems. It looks unprofessional. There are multiple spelling mistakes. There is heaps of missing info. There is material included that isn't really relevant and much that can be reduced and summarised such as the section on contributors/inkers etc. Also there is a massively long winded section on issues, and years of publication which I summarised to look better and be more comprehensive. Most of his powers/abilities have not even been included! Why did you change all what I did when it is correct. <~~Matthew 15th/Dec/2015 16:08~~>

These are the changes I made to....

Publication History A Moon Knight ongoing series was launched in April 2006 running to 2009. It was initially written by Charlie Huston with artwork by David Finch.[1][2][3] As of issue 14 of this series, Mike Benson took over writing duties[4][5] with Huston acting as story-outline adviser. 'Silent Knight' a single one off issue was released in 2008 by Peter Milligan and artist Laurence Campbell.[6] The 2006 series ended with Issue #30 (July 2009). The 30 comic series was released in both trade paperback and Premiere Hardcover editions comprising of 5 issues of The Bottom (Issues #1 - #6) which also featured a variant collectible Direct Market Edition cover, Midnight Sun (Issues #7 - #13), God & Country (Issues #14 - #20), The Death of Marc Spector (Issues #21 - #25) and Down South (Issues #26 - #30)[7]. There was only one Annual comic in the series, printed in 2008 and released in the Midnight Sun trade paperback as 'Date Night' it was written by Duane Swierczvnski with artwork by Jefte Palo. The issue evidences something many non Moon Knight fans think he is completely incapable of displaying, that being of the community overseer looking out for the general public's best interests, one who cares, and one who even saves![8] This 'caring side' is further evidenced in issues #29 and #30 of 'Down South'. This was followed up by a 10 issue series titled Vengeance of the Moon Knight. Beginning September 2009 it was written by Gregg Hurwitz with graphics by Jerome Opena.[9] The character begins to stabilise, evidenced in the previous series final issues, in his capacity to understand the consequences and the reactions of his actions. Still plagued by Konshu he rejects the deities demands taking out his 'vengeance' in less brutal displays. The comic run was released in a 2 issue trade paperback series of Volume 1 Shock and Awe (Issues #1 - #6), and Volume 2 Killed Not Dead (Issues #7 - #10). After Vengeance of the Moon Knight was canceled, Moon Knight was placed in the team book Secret Avengers (appearing for the title's first 21 issues), in the trade paperback/hardcover released Shadowland three issue story-line by Hurwitz and and Dazo, and in a 2010 re-launch of Heroes for Hire.

At the 2011 New York Comic Con it was announced that a brand new Moon Knight series to be written by Brian Michael Bendis and Alex Maleev would see a "complete reinvention of the character on every conceivable level."[10] This volume launched in May 2011 ended with issue #12 in April 2012.[11] It featured Moon Knight being troubled by further personalities of Spider-Man, Wolverine and Captain America fighting his mind and 'helping him' be the best hero he can. It was released in 2 hardcover trade issues, Volume 1 (Issues #1 - #7) andVolume 2 (Issues #8 - #12). 2014 - 2015 saw Marvel[12] launch 2 series. The first a new ongoing series as part of the all new Marvel NOW! initiative. Totaling 17 comics they were released in 3 trade paperbacks of From The Dead (Issues #1 - #6), Dead Will Rise (Issues #7 - #12) and In The Night (Issues #13 - #17). The series emerges another aspect to the character in the form of a suited and booted, Mr.Knight. The second 2014 - 2015 initiative was a new compilation series, the EPIC Collection. Similar to their Essential Collection it differed in that this series is full colour. The series so far includes Volume 1: Bad Moon Rising (2014, 504 pages) covering the period 1975 - 1981 and Volume 2: Shadows of The Moon (2015, 512 pages) covering the period 1981 - 1982. [13]

2016 is to see a new Moon Knight series written by Jeff Lemire and artist Greg Smallwood. Taking a departure from the normal expectation of a comic run it is planned to have a large focus on the not so-often explored aspect by many writers (or series), that being, the psychological issues, the mental scaring and identity issues (or multiple identity issues) suffered by super heroes, associated with having an alter ego as a 'super hero' and what being a super hero entails whilst simultaneously undertaking a 'normal life' as a member of society[14]. This has already been evidenced heavily within the Moon Knight series from its very inception but Lemire has detailed to delve deeper into this aspect showing us sides to Spector and Moon Knight yet to be fully explored. [15] Superb athlete, Extreme levels of endurance and durability, Expert in multiple martial arts disciplines, Skilled acrobat and gymnast, Pro boxer, Expert hand to hand combatant, Marine level military training, Avengers training, Weapons expertise, Expert detective and interrogator, Expert in covert and espionage activities, High intelligence, Expert aviator, Expert marksman, Resistance to some psychic assaults, Possesses traditional and sophisticated weaponry, Attains increased strength-senses-agility through moon phases

Series and Issues Releases (vol. 1 Nov 80 - July 84): 38 (vol. 2 Jue - Dec 85): 6 (Vol. 3 Marc Spector June 89 - Mar 94): 60 (vol. 4 1998):4 (vol. 5 1999): 4 (vol. 6 2006 - 2009): 30 (Vengeance 2010): 10 (Shadowland 2011): 3 (vol. 7 2012): 12 (vol. 8 2014 - 2015): 17

Contributors Writer(s): Doug Moench, Alan Zelenetz, Chuck Dixon, J. M. DeMatteis, Terry Kavanagh, Charlie Huston, Mike Benson, Duane Swierczynski, Brian Michael Bendis, Warren Ellis, Brian Wood, Cullen Bunn Penciller(s): Bill Sienkiewicz, Kevin Nowlan, Bo Hampton, Sal Velluto, Ron Garney, Gary Kwapisz, James Fry, Stephen Platt, Chris Warner, David Finch, Mico Suayan, Tomm Coker, Jefte Palo, Mark Texeira, Alex Maleev, Declan Shalvey, Greg Smallwood, Giuseppe Camuncoli, Ron Ackins Inker(s): Mark Farmer, Tom Palmer, Danny Miki, Crime-lab Studios, Victor Olazaba, Allen Martinez, Dan Brown, Lee Loughridge, Matt Hollingsworth, Jordie Bellaire, Dan Brown

<~~Matthew 15th December 2015 16:14~~>

This is what the page stated before I added my changes...

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2015) This article does not follow Wikipedia's guidelines on the use of different tenses. (March 2015)

I really would like to know why my changes are not considered? Furthermore, how I cannot have them left on there? Why do my changes have to go before someone to 'evaluate' it....it is free for anyone to update incorrect incorrect info.

~~Matthew 15th Dec, 2015~~

Charlie-27

Why do you keep slitting this out of the list article? The version you're restoring is nothing but a plot dump, and the character's not notable outside of his team membership. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Actually, it is a little better than a "plot dump" now, as it does have a couple of links to an independent website. That's a lot better than a whole lot of other fictional character articles on Wikipedia, many of which have no such sources. It's on you though; if that's not enough and you're not willing to give it a chance, you can re-merge it and I won't restore it. Meanwhile, I will see if I can find any other sources to add as reception or development and maybe change your mind. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Asgardian

Hello regarding your recent edits, please do not remove the piped link to Asgard (comics), Asgardian redirects there anyway. The piped link is place there to avoid the additional step. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Fair enough, I will keep the piped links to Asgard (comics). 73.168.15.161 (talk) 16:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Nova (Richard Rider): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. TheFrog001 (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

OK, thanks! That is worth considering. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Beyonders. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

JamesBWatson, I will leave it alone. It appears that while most people at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Beyonders discussion disagree with User:BeyonderGod on his edits, they are unwilling to do anything about them but argue with him. I'm not going to revert him alone, if no one else will back me up. Out of curiosity, you gave a warning to me as an IP user, but did you warn anyone else about edit warring on this article? BeyonderGod has done this five times in the last three weeks: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 73.168.15.161 (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

• BeyonderGod knows full well about edit-warring, having been blocked for it more than once in the past, so he needs no warning. Also, BeyonderGod is disruptive, and seems to think that his opinion over-rides consensus. HE posted to my talk page, asking me to protect the article, apparently so that he would gain advantage in the edit-war over you and any other IP editor. I refused to protect the article, and told BeyonderGod that I was considering whether to block him for edit-warring. In fact, I have decided not to block him now, since he has made no further edits since my message to him, but I will be willing to do so if he continues in the same way any more. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

JamesBWatson, fair enough; sorry if I misjudged you. In this case I will have to be the "bigger man" and not edit war with him, even if that means leaving numerous grammar errors, factual errors, original research, unsourced information, and other problems that he refuses to take accountability for. :\ He claims he is "too busy" and doesn't have enough time to fix these things, but he is fine if other people want to go ahead and do that. Ugh. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

(Since I can't thank an IP via the thank button I will thank you directly on your talk page.) Thanks for reverting a long time IP sock vandal. —DangerousJXD (talk) 03:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

DangerousJXD, you're welcome. :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 05:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Master of Kung Fu

Hello, 73.168.15.161. You have new messages at NukeofEarl's talk page.
Message added 12:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Daredevil

Since you have posted about this on his talk page, you may want to know that User:Zjec appears to have started edit-warring again at Daredevil (Marvel Comics). I have posted a warning on his talk page.--Tenebrae (talk) 03:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Tenebrae, it looks like he has chosen other things to edit-war about, aside from just including Mr. Fear's name in the lead. That's not the best way for him to avoid getting himself into more trouble. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

discussion of your Avengers split

I thought you might like to weigh in. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Avengers (comics) split Argento Surfer (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Doctor Strange

Hello, I'm 2602:306:3357:BA0:80F9:2799:1785:96D3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor Strange has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2602:306:3357:BA0:80F9:2799:1785:96D3 (talk) 02:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Repeated requests

Please do not continue to make demands of my time. Mtminchi08 (talk) 01:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Mtminchi08, I am sorry, I did not mean to offend. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 02:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Loki (comics)

Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Loki (comics) article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Kaobear (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kaobear, the text that was removed from the article by another IP user and then restored by me was not originally added by me. I believe it was added by someone opposing another person who was edit-warring to make sure the article said something about "the true main antagonist"... well, I guess that hidden note has served its purpose, as the edit-warring is long over. :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 01:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Daredevil

HI. I understand you're not a registered editor and so may not be familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines regarding article titles. Firstly, even with italics, " Daredevil (comic book) " can refer to two completely different publications, and so is technically invalid as an article name. This was an issue back in 2005 or so when Daredevil (Marvel Comics) was given that name. Second, depending on we look at it, the pertinent pages regarding proper procedure for creating a spinoff page as you did are WP:PROSPLIT and Wikipedia:Requested moves. The title for a major new page should be discussed and achieve consensus if there is any possibility, as there is here, of a confusing an invalid article title.--Tenebrae (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Thing (comics)

It may interest you to know that the troll at Thing (comics) has returned. A "shitstorm" is apparently on the way. That edit will likely be made at other articles as well like last time. —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

OK thank you, I will take a look. Fortunately for at least the Thing article, it is on pending revisions so that should get reverted quickly (in fact, the article is on pending revisions BECAUSE of that crap, if I remember correctly). 73.168.15.161 (talk) 03:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

How are you two enjoying my "shitstorm" so far?113.210.52.243 (talk) 05:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Tons of fun! Glad it gives you something to do. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

In Other Media A: EMH

Why did you revert my edits? They were reverted in the past because I forgot to cite my sources then I didn't site a credible sources so this time I went straight to the source plus interviews to make it over sourced so it would be impossible to revert and you reverted it so i want to know why?

Fluffyroll11 (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

If you're referring to the Earth's Mightiest Heroes future plans, I reverted those because they are all clearly highly speculative. It's clear from the language of "intended to appear in... possible season 3 or in the original plans" and saying "most likely considered", which shows that the plans were not clearly known, or that these are best guesses and not known facts. Additionally, accusing Jeph Loeb of "executive meddling" is possibly a WP:BLP violation.[6] If that is the best that can be shown about items like that, then they are really not encyclopedic and don't belong here. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 02:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Bringing back the relatives field in comic book character info boxes

Hey can you state your stance on this topic here? It sounded like to me that you were in support of it returning. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Creators labelling

If your so hellbent on changing all of my (writer - artist) edits to (writer / artist) could you help me out with changing my original additions of (Writer) and (Artist) to lowercase as they are suppose to be (writer) and (artist) not capitalized. that would be greatly appreciated as I keep on trying to make sure I get them all but, keep on finding some that are still left capitalized. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 20:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

As I remember, I did try to change them all to lowercase at one point, but you reverted me so I gave up. When I find them, I will try to adjust them to lowercase. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 23:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Did I revert them? I am sorry. How were you able to them all at once? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 01:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Hellcat

We also have her rank-up items appearing in a premium chest — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.8.168 (talk) 13:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Was that English? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm Mayur. An edit you recently made to Deadpool seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 11:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but that last person's edit was made with no source whatsoever. If they are acting in good faith, they will need to be able to provide source information on where they came up with this idea. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deadpool. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 11:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

G.i.joe Steeler

Hi, I have re-added the sentence about Steeler being in g.i.joe the movie, and the question of whether he returned from the alternate reality, but I have left a citation needed with it, as many people have wondered the same thing. Maybe an answer can be found.

User:DavidgoodheartDavidgoodheart (talk) 06:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Mega-villain accusation (obviously fake)

Just so you are aware, you were recently falsely accused of being the "Mega-villain" vandal by a known troll that uses multiple IPs to vandalise articles and harass users. This isn't anything to worry about, as the accusation is clearly fake and identifying the troll is easy. However, I nonetheless thought you should be aware. DarkKnight2149 23:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, Darkknight2149. I fight against vandals and trolls, so hopefully no one takes those sort of accusations seriously. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 03:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Hello, I'm Falcon Kirtaran. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Juggernaut (comics), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FalconK (talk) 05:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

FalconK, if you look again, you'll notice that I actually removed something that was unsourced. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 05:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Oh no, you're right! I guess I should go have some coffee or something. I've restored your version. Thanks! FalconK (talk) 05:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Harold Meachum response and more

Even though I helped to improve the article for Harold Meachum, TTN was the one who re-established the revert. I'm just letting you know that I had no idea of the redirect restore. As for Holden Radcliffe, you're going to need more historical information on him before it can be made into a notable page. Adamstom.97 is holding off on developing the pages for the other Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. characters outside of Phil Coulson until further notice. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Of course the same thing would've happened if any contributors would establish a page for Big Ben Donovan with every info possible even with a mentioning of his son Little Ben Donovan. Big Ben Donovan was adapted to being the lawyer for Wilson Fisk and Mariah Dillard in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beth Sotelo has been accepted

Beth Sotelo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 02:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Gambit's name

I'm not sure consensus was ever reached, but how to name characters in the opening sentence has been discussed before. It may be worth bringing up on the talk page or starting another discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Upon closer inspection, you were probably already aware of that discussion. You started it. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Good point. But yes, I don't think consensus was ever reached on that subject. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 06:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Doombot has been reverted.
Your edit here to Doombot was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://marvel.wikia.com/Doombot_(Earth-616)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Merry Christmas

Argento Surfer (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Argento Surfer, thank you! And you as well. :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 15:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Thing (comics)

It may interest you to know that the troll at Thing (comics) has returned. A "shitstorm" is apparently on the way. That edit will likely be made at other articles as well like last time. 113.210.52.220 (talk) 06:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Probably so. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 02:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Moon Knight

Hey there, I reverted where you removed the description to superhero from Moon Knight, perhaps prematurely, as it seemed like it made sense for it to be there. It's been a heck of a night for vandals coming from IP addresses, which you are clearly not. No hard feelings intended :) K_arunamon ^Talk 04:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, and giving me more a benefit of a doubt. Whenever there is any possibility of controversy or question for using terms like "superhero" and "supervillain", we have been going with the more generic term of "character" instead. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

James Dallas Egbert III

I note that you altered my recent update to the entry regarding the Egbert case, leaving the comment "sounds like hearsay". I'm guessing you have not read William C Dear's book "The Dungeon Master". In it, Dear recounts conversations he had with Egbert after he contacted him and makes the statement that Egbert's unresolved issues about his sexuality was at least one of the causes of his depression. Yes, it's possible that Dear may have been incorrect, but as no other source seems to refute this, we have to presume he was correct.

As the statement is supported by this primary source, I have reverted your change. Unless you can find material refuting Dear's book, I would ask you politely to refrain from removing the statement again. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.39.64.38 (talk) 13:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Fury and S.H.I.E.L.D. links

I just want to thank you for the links you made to the articles that I created.★Trekker (talk) 09:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Treker, no problem, and thanks for creating them! 73.168.15.161 (talk) 12:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

★Trekker (talk) 12:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello, 73.168.15.161. Thanks for your edits at the Dungeons & Dragons Gazetteer articles. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

You are welcome! Thanks for your good work. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 03:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Abyss (Dungeons & Dragons)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Jim1138, I figured that might get reverted since I accidentally hit "enter" before I finished my edit summary. What I was trying to say is "we can't use Wikia for a reference, as it is not a reliable source." 73.168.15.161 (talk) 06:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

I see what happened. There has been a large amount of vand just now with obvious vandalism and wp:ES. I would suggest adding a {{sources | section | date= February 2017}} template:sources. rather than just removing it. Let it stew for a few months then remove it. Perhaps list your concern on the talk page too. Although, having become cynical as of late, nothing will likely be done about it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

You know, with something like D&D a Wiki may be the "official reference". Just sayin' Jim1138 (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Operator873. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hellcow without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Operator873 (talk) 02:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Operator873, I did explain why I removed it with my edit summary. The text I removed did nothing more than document a trivial mention of a character which did not actually appear in a TV episode. Since it was just a mention of a character by name, a character which has never appeared in the TV series at all so far as I know, and was likely only mentioned as an in-joke to comics fans, I don't see the value in retaining that information in the article. Can you offer some advise to change my opinion on that? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 02:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Additionally, the text I removed claims that the joke "validates the character's existence within the Marvel Cinematic Universe." This seems particularly unlikely. How do we know that the character exists in the show based on someone making a joke about a name? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 02:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

The existence of the character would be confirmed by the character being referenced in the scripts of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Even if it's a tip of the hat to comic book fans, because it made it into the script, was read, was kept, and became part of the episode, that obscure reference still validates and legitimizes the existence of the character. If did not legitimize Hellcow's existence, then to what were the characters referring to when the "joke" was made during the episode? Further, the article having an encyclopedic amount of information, however obscure or trivial, is good for an encyclopedia to have, is it not? Operator873 (talk) 02:47, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

I have opened a discussion on the Talk Page for the article. Please contribute your thoughts and feelings on the matter. Operator873 (talk) 03:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Unmerging

If you're going to unmerge Marvel fictional characters. Can you please provide notability or consensus. Just an appearance from a tv show doesn't cut it. Definitely if they are minor in the comic books. It's sometimes fine for them just to stay where they are at. . Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 12:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Removing copyvio materials from Harold Meachum

Hello, just wanted to let you know that I'm removing some content that violate copyright guidelines from the aforementioned article. Refer this for inference. Please have me posted in case there are any queries on the same and kindly try and avoid them going forward. Thanks.
TopCipher (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

I would say that almost certainly IMDB copied that text from us at some point. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Drewmutt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gamora— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on List of Heliopolitans

I have removed some of the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/osiristhor.htm, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Norman Osborn

Enough with the edit war. Next time you revert again I'm reporting you got it!2600:387:8:11:0:0:0:85 (talk) 02:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 73.168.15.161. You have new messages at Talk:Deadpool.
Message added 00:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reb1981 (talk) 00:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ghost Rider (Johnny Blaze) into Ghost Rider (comic book). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

If you're going to revert a referenced contribution, could you give more justification than "rvt - huh?"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spider-Man_2099&diff=prev&oldid=811529555

There was an inconsistency in the comic that never made sense. 21 years ago, writer Peter David explained it to a fan newsgroup in the reference I cited. If you think it should be moved to a footnote, fine; if you think it doesn't even deserve that much inclusion, ok perhaps, but at least please grant the courtesy of arguing why, instead of just reverting with a dismissive "huh?". --Undomelin (talk) 18:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Katharine Kerr have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Katharine Kerr was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://blogs.myspace.com/jdglass) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

External links

Hi. Please read WP:ELCITE for the template for external links sections. They should not be cited using the reference templates. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

archivedate is a thing

You can't add |archiveurl= without also an |archivedate= and |deadurl= as you did here. Don't you see the red error message? Do it like this: [7] -- GreenC 05:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

In this edit today, you neglected to add |archivdate= and |deadurl=. I have corrected it for you, this time. In the future, please do so, as it is leaving red errors. -- GreenC 14:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about that. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 00:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Wrong

Your're completely wrong about both arguments:

First - as you can see in Portal:Role-playing games, it is said: "Role-playing games also include single-player offline role-playing video games in which players control a character or team who undertake quests, and may include capabilities that advance using statistical mechanics.";

Second - as said in articles pages: "The number of actions a combatant may perform each round is limited. While each round's duration is a fixed short interval of real time, the player can configure the combat system to pause at specific events or at the end of each round, or set the combat system to never automatically pause, giving the illusion of real-time combat. Combat actions are calculated using DnD rules" (Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic); " Like its predecessor, it is set in the Star Wars universe 4,000 years before the events of the film Episode I: The Phantom Menace and is based on the d20 System developed by Wizards of the Coast." (Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords)

So is just that. Hope now it's clear. Lone Internaut (talk) 05:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Lone Internaut: I would recommend you actually read Wikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing games which says "Role-playing video games are outside the scope of this project; they belong at WikiProject VG.". --Masem (t) 05:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Masem: Then I wonder why portal (even main article, actually) and project - about the same topic - say two different things. It doesn't change that much anyway. Both games still works on D&D rules and d20 board game system. So they are still related to both project. I put "low" importance anyway, so I don't really see the problem. Lone Internaut (talk) 05:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Lone Internaut: What a Wikiproject chooses to cover is not required to include everything that our pages or even other definitions would necessarily include. That the RPG project chooses not to include video games makes sense since the approach to writing about a tabletop RPG vs a computer RPG, including what sources are appropriate for those, will be very different. In terms of Categories, computer RPGs are still RPGs, but in terms of Wikiproject coverage, they are different. --Masem (t) 06:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Masem: I see what you're saying. So how you suggest to end it? I mean also other video games are linked to RPG project. I understand removing RPG project link, but should D&D project remain? Afterall those video games follow its rules and d20 system. Can be a good compromise? Lone Internaut (talk) 06:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Lone Internaut: Reading Wikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons, while their project does include D&D video games, they appear to be strictly games that are within the D&D canon/narrative, not games that happen to use the D&D d20 type system. That's why with Wikiproject headers, you can't just go by content, but by the scope of the project. --Masem (t) 14:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough, I only searched for "d20" on Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic and that did not come up, so I did not go on to check Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords to see if that one mentioned "d20". How can it be that one article is very clear on what system both was developed, but the other article does not mention it at all?

As to the argument that d20 is D&D, that is a common error. d20 and D&D have a very clear relationship, but they are not the same thing. There is a lot of material produced using the D&D system that has no relation to D&D at all, and including any article relating to d20 in the D&D project just does not make sense; in those cases, including them in the RPG project is enough.

Although these articles have no good reason to be in the D&D project, I will not remove them from the RPG project again, although I think both articles need to have sourced information on how they were developed using the d20 system to justify having that one. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

It was me, being wrong. Masem is right, nor RPG or D&D project have to remain. They can be removed. Anyway one article is good article the other one is not, so The Sith Lords has necessarily to specify clearly what kind of game-system is being used, I think it's that. A pleasure to collaborate, sorry the bother. Lone Internaut (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough, no worries! I will remove both of them now. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit You made

Why did you remove a cleanup tag from the last article you edited?? Maybe you can add more references to the article so you can remove the tag for real? JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 06:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

cn tags

Hello. Please do not excessively add {{cn}} tags to article or it will be regarded as disruptive editing. Thanks.

~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 11:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

If two are "excessive" then hopefully one is OK? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Songbird (comics), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gene Colan. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Do you have any rational reason at all to explain how those edits were problematic? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 02:50, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Direct quotes

Please try to write more content in your own words - long direct quotes are to be used sparingly, and only if some great, detailed statement captures an idea in ways that can’t be paraphrased. You have been adding a lot of rather long ones awfully frequently. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia isn’t just a collection of quotes. See WP:QUOTEFARM and WP:LONGQUOTE for more info. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 21:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

You're right, sorry about that. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 21:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure how that edit qualifies as a fringe theory; it is valid reception information on one of the releases in the series from a reliable source. If you could please explain why you think it qualifies that way? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Yeah that edit makes no sense.★Trekker (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cletus Kasady. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I removed unsourced information from an article. Can you please explain how that is disruptive? We are not required to keep unsourced information. It is up to the editor wishing to keep the information to add an appropriate reliable source. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 14:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Maybe next time make an effort to find a source for things like this which are plainly easily verifiable and non-controversial. See WP:PRESERVE which is a policy. -- GreenC 14:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

We'll see. Maybe don't make so many assumptions? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Entertainment Weekly:

Please don't copy paste entire reviews into articles. Please try to summarize. EW is a decent enough source, especially since it's a general audience publication, and has really old game reviews. We need more of that. But simply copy-pasting their entire review is rather lazy. Please go back and summarize them. I will personally go through these and try to summarize them myself if I have to, but I'd prefer if you were to do it and save me some work.

You've also made some rather blatant errors as well. You added the EW review of the Battle Arena Toshinden Original Animated Video to the article about the game. Same title, but not the same thing. This has been corrected. Also, you added a review of a 1991 Gameboy game called "Super Scrabble" to the article on the 2004 board game "Super Scrabble". Other than sharing the same name, they're unrelated.

Also, instead of just plopping an EW review in the reception section and calling it done, the EW reviews would be more useful as citations for other sections. In the review, they'll describe gameplay, or other elements, and then that can be used for citations in other sections. Harizotoh9 (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

You'll probably notice that I did all of that a couple of months ago - I finished up with what I was looking for, and have not added any more. In reflection, I know I did not put as much effort into that little project as I should have, but I was trying to push through to get it done and move on to other things. I appreciate the effort you put into cleaning it up. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 00:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

I went through all of them and either summarized, or just cut it down to just the review score. EW is a perfectly valid source, and I highly encourage adding more of them. How many EW reviews from the 90's are there that haven't been added to pages? I'd like to see 100% of them added. Many of these pages have few sources, and if EW archives are online, we should use them since they're easy to access. Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

LOL yeah, I had to stop at one point because... I'm sure I could have gone on and on. I just did one review and just video games. I've got a million other things I'd rather be doing, but I had a bug to get that done, so at least that is one thing out of the way, and if people want to use that as a source to strengthen an article, now they have a link. :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 05:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Would you be willing to do the rest of the EW reviews? I don't know how to search their site. All you need to do is just say "EW game the game a score of" and put the letter, and a ref. Others can use it to expand the article later. Harizotoh9 (talk) 03:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

I would, but probably not in the near future, as I have other things I want to work on first. But if you like, I will try to find some time to locate them for you? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bullseye (comics). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cedric White (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

One man's unconstructive and disruptive, is the opposite in the eyes of another man. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 12:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoff Grabowski has been accepted

Geoff Grabowski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 22:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Fantastic, thank you for letting me know! :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Geoffrey C. Grabowski, you may be blocked from editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 12:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Abelmoschus Esculentus, can you please take another look at my edit and give me your honest opinion as to whether that was truly disruptive? At least, in the sense that does the article need two conflicting defaultsorts, and duplicated categories? Thank you. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 12:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

It appears to be a knee-jerk reaction to an IP removing categories - one of the hazards of not registering an account. Just curious...have you considered registering ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 13:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Warning struck. Many apologies. (Because the diff in Huggle did not show the redundant categories). @Atsme: It has been reverted, and I did not revert it without thinking ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

No worries! :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mockingbird (Marvel Comics)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ―Susmuffin ^Talk 01:35, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blind Justice (comics)

The article Blind Justice (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olivia (The Walking Dead)

The article Olivia (The Walking Dead) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Olivia (The Walking Dead) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivia (The Walking Dead) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Morales (The Walking Dead) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morales (The Walking Dead) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morales (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Arat (The Walking Dead) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arat (The Walking Dead) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arat (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

---