Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Carpenter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:14, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:14, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to MacGyver. MBisanz talk 01:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nikki Carpenter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete - fictional character with nothing indicating any notability beyond the series. Otto4711 (talk) 07:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or keep I think a major charactr in a major series. But if not as important as I think, then a merge is fine. I can see no reason for deleting altogether. DGG (talk)
- Delete. No evidence of notability independent of the series. McWomble (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect Likely search term and notable within the series. - Mgm|(talk) 09:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of real world notability or coverage from third parties. JBsupreme (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable character. At best, I'd say redirect her name to the page that has her first mentioning (whether an episode article, season article, or the parent page). I don't even see why should would need extended mentioning in any broad coverage page (e.g. The main Macguyver article). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.